IETF Logo Mail Archive

[rfc-i] Wrong Internet search results for new RFCs

Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> Tue, 03 May 2022 01:23 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56766C15EB24 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 May 2022 18:23:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1651541013; bh=mZ4l6kT7sl6V/5oqhlVhVDnaEs7r0oSDYvIGFBRWPXg=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=Y3RguirPxkjginMh/PoA7lakmFqgD37KNa2iqWAo2iZVUt98TyXsqiWsqflS3iT77 POKndF/Ly73UIOPq1d1orb2Eh8N1uQwKYCdeYV0kQL0jigc5AX/1+Njk6u57cyMs3w fE/H/665wGw/fyVsKkB65rqn8eAnLOHYic7nq75s=
X-Mailbox-Line: From rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org Mon May 2 18:23:33 2022
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0C80C15E3EA; Mon, 2 May 2022 18:23:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1651541012; bh=mZ4l6kT7sl6V/5oqhlVhVDnaEs7r0oSDYvIGFBRWPXg=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=uDFB7id52vq3cMg0qFzQElbtsLfY5VRkeh9NCvXywBDXA81Wzhky8feaRFCwAJBIz 8vINLbOIT58WC+qVXUB8tuOhehn4qvhyNpnsyhu7SCFukAo7PAXiGcX2Vu9yEGLjEq LniAHpUHMUi6ZbjZiwPIRBir6KV2xKdl+EVSVZfg=
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C398C15E3EA for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 May 2022 18:23:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.868
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.868 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Cn-_mfgvuTyJ for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 May 2022 18:23:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93F95C14F72F for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 2 May 2022 18:23:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:51]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18CB058C4AF for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 3 May 2022 03:23:21 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 10463) id F32964EAD9B; Tue, 3 May 2022 03:23:20 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 03 May 2022 03:23:20 +0200
From: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Message-ID: <YnCECATOh9mI1HY4@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-interest/jk77SKUnjXwwsF0ko2GvxkXqSro>
Subject: [rfc-i] Wrong Internet search results for new RFCs
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

When i search for RFC9148 on google or bing, i do only get

https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/authors/rfc9148.html

And of course the URL already does not exist anymore.
And yes, i did at least send a note to google.

I assume that google/bing get these URLs from the searchable directory

https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/authors/

Alas, i am not on top of all those HTTP headers that could be set
to prohibit or discourage caching information from this directy
in search engines. But if there i an easy fix by better config
on the www.rfc-editor.org webserver, that would be nice.

Cheers
    toerless

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email