Re: [rfc-i] Wrong Internet search results for new RFCs

John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Tue, 03 May 2022 17:18 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46CF7C15E40C for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 May 2022 10:18:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1651598299; bh=Hyy3ydjxWiNkOLqllEx9WVy6FPZCUgvu3O69otY4T1g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=pfQ6Zw+N8HC8dWWEdW4HHA587IwebcJOR7SVlCG4HmUeMF8u65wfUcjuiR/Y+Kmyc CVjktxaDVkIoJTm6rSQeGKUi2CKcO2bw8NYBI7WjTEsQR5XlzHq1Duhv/9UQye31cs pvEG6PtpzplE9SUFaktfjyTfTd+EDa15hRRzor2s=
X-Mailbox-Line: From rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org Tue May 3 10:18:19 2022
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B93CC1594B5; Tue, 3 May 2022 10:18:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1651598299; bh=Hyy3ydjxWiNkOLqllEx9WVy6FPZCUgvu3O69otY4T1g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=pfQ6Zw+N8HC8dWWEdW4HHA587IwebcJOR7SVlCG4HmUeMF8u65wfUcjuiR/Y+Kmyc CVjktxaDVkIoJTm6rSQeGKUi2CKcO2bw8NYBI7WjTEsQR5XlzHq1Duhv/9UQye31cs pvEG6PtpzplE9SUFaktfjyTfTd+EDa15hRRzor2s=
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94E74C1594B5 for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 May 2022 10:18:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=NG/3eb9z; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=v77tObxt
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v1dfr0Lh0W6R for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 May 2022 10:18:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5431AC1594B1 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 3 May 2022 10:18:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 91860 invoked from network); 3 May 2022 17:18:10 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=166cf.627163d2.k2205; bh=m+NL0W3y6YC1+MqgxKV0uSQbNQkXaqMxcpyiA4IS2kE=; b=NG/3eb9zUqOXJhpy1FKzOKqSDZtrodlxlDhN9rJekmxMyhhsSWTwh4Z4UzjGoA6MvoTLzW+NNv/PdlF/6NUHUYQVJTi5pIDjVx7MaHijKefESnoctpqsZupdX+HsQ838ZhuJmL4goExuQPqIlw9MIzt5BRHGbwNHPRFIXA6iA6gt/E38qVZ1YDnKtyHnyS3GHqsALBzYo59CnHugpvXmbuQeb3fyhPdCpNeIZvOEze8jF5HVj74f77cPL3aw00G2yIuwPpiXLyMhwEp9zANfirCfmjREuNEGQ3ZiqNkenNTwFUHrSXZmbGqfJ567BiyFcGrkrIeTbbAFAhGoZU/VCQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=166cf.627163d2.k2205; bh=m+NL0W3y6YC1+MqgxKV0uSQbNQkXaqMxcpyiA4IS2kE=; b=v77tObxtP/+/pfdw3uAWyXawnI1shQeUhAHaosR8WoPDOX3gX7g/M7VYS3DsUbHGYP9gD0A+Znvw75fc3T5HsxZnzEjivXsNNG2lcMP+FSoLp5XNkf7Uvn2ajPUEa+7n1JKG5740VHC8KPCeycNmvri3Tt+TOb4PjBFd7FOYn6S80PyhTg+ZJA17c/GBKnT3vdsuzfksxbME8NN1YokOXXRT4oiDuPSZa8yQYtcDtjf+657vHgX1dlkGqisxF/dbpZLP+TsRdPYNvRZDCYqT+vitWHk9Xmzt3USbDhAclRlCYlPYdy4EAvEqnmVwORgTC2aXYsThaPN2+dBFQ9z/+A==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 03 May 2022 17:18:10 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id E27663F51767; Tue, 3 May 2022 13:18:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ary.qy (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72A013F51749; Tue, 3 May 2022 13:18:09 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 03 May 2022 13:18:09 -0400
Message-ID: <710830b2-0361-83e0-314f-3b39ee9422d2@taugh.com>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
Cc: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-X-Sender: johnl@ary.qy
In-Reply-To: <YnCkoCzNTr3aquH/@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <YnCECATOh9mI1HY4@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <20220503021720.69EDC3F4BACA@ary.qy> <YnCkoCzNTr3aquH/@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-interest/yrWp0H5FiKSenjSoUmiykAJ11_I>
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Wrong Internet search results for new RFCs
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

On Tue, 3 May 2022, Toerless Eckert wrote:
>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/authors/
>>
>> No, that's not how search engines work. They only add working URLs to
>> their index,
>
> Sure, but they need to find the URL first, and given how these "authors"
> URLs are typically private-email used, i wouldn't know where the
> search engines would find he URLs other than from the index URL.

They only add URLs that work.

> The site-map would list a URL like https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/authors/rfc9148.html
> given how its temporary... ?!

I wrote the script that generates the site map and it never included 
anything in the authors directory.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest