Re: [rfc-i] Wrong Internet search results for new RFCs

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Tue, 03 May 2022 21:51 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95D2DC15ED53 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 May 2022 14:51:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1651614701; bh=NPDVLL+gl4wzJh3biF8nVd9LSwVRLsTQGvI13D6+BGE=; h=From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=h+aEcQUtThnNYsKq/Y8xeNxXSe2tSauX47MwCjcPrj+3oB61pPi/v9JgmZTglyk6i IUlagTSRmi/rZD5gVPYJ2sGtE2L/oAkOb6SF69arQJbvccBRHVKwupnLg6Q/WFjBo3 GYpm8iODtHG74F0bHF7qxVhcKeTAMoBZpsLfANGs=
X-Mailbox-Line: From rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org Tue May 3 14:51:41 2022
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01592C15952B; Tue, 3 May 2022 14:51:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1651614701; bh=NPDVLL+gl4wzJh3biF8nVd9LSwVRLsTQGvI13D6+BGE=; h=From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=h+aEcQUtThnNYsKq/Y8xeNxXSe2tSauX47MwCjcPrj+3oB61pPi/v9JgmZTglyk6i IUlagTSRmi/rZD5gVPYJ2sGtE2L/oAkOb6SF69arQJbvccBRHVKwupnLg6Q/WFjBo3 GYpm8iODtHG74F0bHF7qxVhcKeTAMoBZpsLfANGs=
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5011AC15952B for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 May 2022 14:51:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DSA7WiqqbRMo for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 May 2022 14:51:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDF33C159494 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 3 May 2022 14:51:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F3DD38BDB for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 3 May 2022 18:04:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 8sYQE8HzlMK1 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 3 May 2022 18:04:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FD1F38BD3 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 3 May 2022 18:04:33 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1651615473; bh=BZbNKjTJBEE5/kWMCrHI0xM17ONU8FRRgEkVLJcw27Y=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=dIogh2m6hNuofbJyoGSpn+PlTA6StyU9Y7aES3AgMyGlxREq8kfu04O1SzrM+Td/v wWb3G8JsRCrx4nDO1VJrJrBMmCTfEbPmjfgdTkl/xx9KFdkZygZx3J7tCByBD3IYF2 NGn6X+pDLzZZcarF03z+p+kEUAHpeDjR14Aur2AZEnM2qw86i6GTGYHzL60mc2rkjG 3i0f0UnqH4fwXzSC5TFbmcKfeoZ/FqcyDBff9Pon4HXiAL9ogzDiItH0cIGN443ZKY fNpdO2BZz7ElJanLJz+1hN/FqkEjPhjARDhn7Ec5Anpz4hmQJ83Z57hFhCBs97hOlg Bmd1zt3KG23TQ==
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8D47147 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 3 May 2022 17:51:27 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <5F87F7FD-B3E3-46B3-B03A-EA7BEF58D179@akamai.com>
References: <20220503021720.69EDC3F4BACA@ary.qy> <2f655efd-603b-ebef-bb01-3859571dbd79@nostrum.com> <20129.1651596111@localhost> <5F87F7FD-B3E3-46B3-B03A-EA7BEF58D179@akamai.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 27.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 03 May 2022 17:51:27 -0400
Message-ID: <9711.1651614687@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-interest/rT6y_ZTzLH-14I4qjV7WMwS7ves>
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Wrong Internet search results for new RFCs
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1737934517396125126=="
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com> wrote:
    >> Wouldn't an HTTP AUTH help?  Even if the username/password is ietf/ietf?

    > We don't want any barriers to our stuff being globally accessible, even
    > if it means a search engine, or us, sometimes get it wrong.

This is the pre-release rfc-editor AUTH48 copies of RFCs.
We actively don't want it globally accessible!
We might want to go as far as everyone in the WG accessing it.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide




_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest