IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] Wrong Internet search results for new RFCs

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Tue, 03 May 2022 22:07 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4E2BC15E6C4 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 May 2022 15:07:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1651615662; bh=CaPaWYuKITs3KvhgGHCoCwiTXZFUfynz6ALeXRmd6TA=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:To:Cc:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=dmUlztj7Ui7qEnonWmBUHqoNfB+JATDIZIBtHJispM7ipSM6h4YYoozGVLTGvLDVg BiEKHU2WXwfk6k+YlA9HDeXKMZhOtjbnP+Qp8TgmFm7wYMlBRi6af7pPv+bs3a77bM kxBseUoME4ZQeCDofUeHJWm6pMYgYwI4U8PhwKuE=
X-Mailbox-Line: From rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org Tue May 3 15:07:42 2022
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5F00C14F746; Tue, 3 May 2022 15:07:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1651615662; bh=CaPaWYuKITs3KvhgGHCoCwiTXZFUfynz6ALeXRmd6TA=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:To:Cc:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=dmUlztj7Ui7qEnonWmBUHqoNfB+JATDIZIBtHJispM7ipSM6h4YYoozGVLTGvLDVg BiEKHU2WXwfk6k+YlA9HDeXKMZhOtjbnP+Qp8TgmFm7wYMlBRi6af7pPv+bs3a77bM kxBseUoME4ZQeCDofUeHJWm6pMYgYwI4U8PhwKuE=
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C10DC14F746 for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 May 2022 15:07:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.893
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.893 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qMaWQ-2BrpwR for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 May 2022 15:07:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2c.google.com (mail-io1-xd2c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB5D3C14F727 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 3 May 2022 15:07:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2c.google.com with SMTP id e15so20495449iob.3 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 03 May 2022 15:07:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=y/noCBglnaQJhbGUc91ju/BVbElQYSaR7K/aXO166hA=; b=tNDcv4ITh/DVGR2cpzfc6Hd7UWWq8oJPOUmhchS5v80LY+ccZNlF24dfMZz85BXQ96 yPLHO7c0nPap83zB66FYTpBHkbQFVmtFngbu6K+3VHIBoLG0AkjjKmVwyBZ9qICI1r/J iSgxkIl1znCc1JtOR3poy53le2xo7vcngfFavRiE9Ys8tsMOOeBkBMdm00WWwGpvk2Uw rYQ9knirLKDkDJ5oxLKJ8k/xPeuVwnpsFL5peqCvQ8ye9BdtgeD4ElkcnIOM+5dLbwFK lmOVPPCEDJ1ZOIL29CagxNJsVhG9HD+oDcQevqh1q0FYYMwbIswqLFo3U6lBwLmiU/n/ V8Ow==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=y/noCBglnaQJhbGUc91ju/BVbElQYSaR7K/aXO166hA=; b=VQ48wxBJ98ZnrtewnmygyY20vpOaXIgoeL0dytPZTWm+pROHjPlh3loDeXMs6Cvl8o giXCut3oyAQS2xB6ZKFhIGTw0S5IevsJK7yFKiXFSJvlBE7G2TTFNT5d9pIH+sXZh1hM kBQrvN4NRffFb65ixymMuCXjOrwKK/izWMmkn9EJzFCvz/9cEURsgInIeUCANOQavAkX h50VeZ2+ilExLhDq0ncQWvY4tVfkceg+xIS68rZXODndIF3dQTbt/7SnpkZZKTTawdAY p+QvYBvkgKrMKoKR71yG443JK+FsxMCqKpF160Y2J7XEk2Fj4G6/Zlwohylm7Qn24Gsw ku8A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5326Le9wabmOVkTyRK5lPsP3SWCwYqs/86d8SbD8q1ZgGTFVSgwO BRy+Ahu9DskjzOoNSCKhqoZHHsLw4jo6KBQ7oHpYQNIfw58=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzmXFqGbnZmap933ALcqJnmocrV8CWBHzmo4wBugaEyaJwUggws7Iahd6B+7++5RvPFltCaXNUjkBMcbBy+av0=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:13c1:b0:323:cda3:d10c with SMTP id i1-20020a05663813c100b00323cda3d10cmr7669835jaj.111.1651615656546; Tue, 03 May 2022 15:07:36 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220503021720.69EDC3F4BACA@ary.qy> <2f655efd-603b-ebef-bb01-3859571dbd79@nostrum.com> <20129.1651596111@localhost> <5F87F7FD-B3E3-46B3-B03A-EA7BEF58D179@akamai.com> <9711.1651614687@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <9711.1651614687@localhost>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Tue, 03 May 2022 15:07:00 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBMYKNj+P79Vm13_LhTrjFfGPsQHb6XVCSQXQh9DR5VUaQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Cc: RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-interest/xVPLHwDA85t6DvJfPlR0zFxeG5Y>
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Wrong Internet search results for new RFCs
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0890717838635733617=="
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 2:51 PM Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
wrote:

>
> Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com> wrote:
>     >> Wouldn't an HTTP AUTH help?  Even if the username/password is
> ietf/ietf?
>
>     > We don't want any barriers to our stuff being globally accessible,
> even
>     > if it means a search engine, or us, sometimes get it wrong.
>
> This is the pre-release rfc-editor AUTH48 copies of RFCs.
> We actively don't want it globally accessible!
>

I don't think I agree with this. In an ideal world, every step along the
way to final publication would be world accessible in perpetuity so that
people could see what had happened.

What we need to do is ensure that these are properly labelled and that
search engines find the right one, but that shouldn't make it impossible to
be transparent.

-Ekr


> We might want to go as far as everyone in the WG accessing it.
>




> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
>            Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rfc-interest mailing list
> rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
> https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
>

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email