IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] Wrong Internet search results for new RFCs

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Tue, 03 May 2022 05:20 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 409D2C15E6CE for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 May 2022 22:20:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1651555257; bh=yCS9cEj++3h6OjJL5s3FEjYd9WhKBRfb67ed763qH1k=; h=Date:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=UObYRCsTX7XNADjQRvVhS6ZxUK/DNVT1AMXg7KvJF57aS/55bhfJ+/JuUIY3vvr9T Sh5Y5M3ASmm2kb3iyW1eVV6RvKsUDwDZ9mjSja+OPY8r3ehFPWlOjjrCFSkAA1YUlT H0DiGskBlKmqVuwe+0GhRNjW9jcYG7TLMASBslig=
X-Mailbox-Line: From rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org Mon May 2 22:20:57 2022
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08E6FC14F732; Mon, 2 May 2022 22:20:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1651555257; bh=yCS9cEj++3h6OjJL5s3FEjYd9WhKBRfb67ed763qH1k=; h=Date:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=UObYRCsTX7XNADjQRvVhS6ZxUK/DNVT1AMXg7KvJF57aS/55bhfJ+/JuUIY3vvr9T Sh5Y5M3ASmm2kb3iyW1eVV6RvKsUDwDZ9mjSja+OPY8r3ehFPWlOjjrCFSkAA1YUlT H0DiGskBlKmqVuwe+0GhRNjW9jcYG7TLMASBslig=
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A5D0C14F732 for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 May 2022 22:20:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.753
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.753 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.857, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7Y74VMWRJGQA for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 May 2022 22:20:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6010C14F72F for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 2 May 2022 22:20:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1651555249; bh=u5nV4X9Fdhyem134Bm+tlKNOu1Od/M7ZKF9yjGGKUEo=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=TouGeBF+dBa6hK4X1v47F3A0ahjYS2hBVnNVZaCl58aLqLcmfvz7Ti5xlfGHporI0 CoqNgYZfKcyNcYk1uBHwEgiOWg+wi2J5SGNBAOJWcED5pVKiiCmwRRxNlna/a6xKly kiTvOdslXsrjj6PoPwdexDZNiaXSfqv8h1RSlCc0=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([84.171.153.39]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MwfWU-1o1bn12e1C-00y8lS for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 03 May 2022 07:20:49 +0200
Message-ID: <5528eb31-2cbd-460b-720c-a69ebe4e7482@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 03 May 2022 07:20:48 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.8.1
To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
References: <YnCECATOh9mI1HY4@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <20220503021720.69EDC3F4BACA@ary.qy> <YnCkoCzNTr3aquH/@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <YnCkoCzNTr3aquH/@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:TnDYVEr7otYdeOoWS3+CurqsFGCMC32QDddDET0708/91OeqX3a 0vNn8J69sgHkCbfLWOi9TuYaD5bw03wrQ+sBdV7b4Co3scSx2GxSM7R2GzP4DbaPzRRMgeL 2/xWewDDavV3tuwXzNdBLJIy7CATJlIIvPN/5B4KO9BIBtfRRiHnSo3jDcZBWf7jyS9Iv2t 0P8q1vOnZTkrtFM7dcKqA==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:Rokr8Ckt4xU=:6ViePFfP1HjGzFG7A06d7r Gx8dx68G0Ue/hn601wz8rPDL1gkNrJGFfc7Py3k1nVZSCU9a3hd4ECiy7KwASiCXNo2chgkh+ +AhxniTDNFc5YyGGntPXw4T9LUznCqWC2Ed+/2jkW5wq42lkqiRet4rEYhW+gcmS2OmdlOfOS t/3M08ZMJR0m+zNDfTMyTCHkQNX7HeEPjpOeEJpPtSDyJVCsUZiCVLYTcm04WuW4tmC3MqLnm VGt9J/v4W21DNUDVxcJFP40AKUknGA1P1bN1Wo961wZbcGPaQTp8LG90M3WCw2iouTm0mZHHz 0kcwcFUpLFN4F1/o4fALBuom2MFU0UORxrtek6JaJlXV/7ZU/vocyJFMnatDStTQrAxRR0Mz+ B5VW1BiC9LhmyxLhh+Vi3WEObbBi3RWeIVbvkjfLp/w84Le3fm/yQuDNJj4fNXf9GF0aaA75d eE8Uhneb9aQP3ms1cKy/Q6MKnS/BOk2Mm3gLwcCbkTWCjhxwpQIpUX8XriYyGW07qYwvtBzKG 2Df891NGeZQ4hFzICVYfhWhZelQonvBi0UVs5PJX1xHeJioSSaQlXiPCpNBq0krvCqnGhV9BC qN94OZWKhSza9VeqvBK+C1ennVeQopP9/dls3eH1zRnAbWycgeF2fUl19J+jD5rqITodBaw2Z 4cpTyzuKm3U9wiIYWhe0jywFo+PS6U5Pl+7gvaAy3ShdqDOZl1nq/ZiMXtCG5XoYvXBpl4xbI E6UbX3y242+ffWnXhs8glRR/cVEOWz0ARb25T6LSMaJFEoemhoXjxIXoZ7o5VI1yaW6kgGTvj XaoBlQNRkYEub3K0vmlelgI/dsnsldf6ZDwEAQ3UrXafvdYArj+mEF2m39wl4GtnGaawDJCEc NxuRxJXBrr/m79X8CxoYAQKRR8klVypILFzrljLybvVzec/i+aqg3OjEh2B+TApMebUp3zVVq cXXE8HbxGeahQ04+GfdwnwpwYW+r7ppiLxm0mojf/RfVXO0gFFPKLN+e7XgB8lq+NlgvGwTpt okgY0GfjSQw+0dnd2AcokD5apJyo2w5gx2zbhd/TVACEbvwGUDeEAL0uzXg0Mztrxlojr/Mu+ 8B/Cy5hthAaBIE=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-interest/xqUdwWxKwR2s4X57NEdBqhZ0rdg>
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Wrong Internet search results for new RFCs
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

Am 03.05.2022 um 05:42 schrieb Toerless Eckert:
> On Mon, May 02, 2022 at 10:17:18PM -0400, John Levine wrote:
>> It appears that Toerless Eckert  <tte@cs.fau.de> said:
>>> When i search for RFC9148 on google or bing, i do only get
>>>
>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/authors/rfc9148.html
>>>
>>> And of course the URL already does not exist anymore.
>>> And yes, i did at least send a note to google.
>>>
>>> I assume that google/bing get these URLs from the searchable directory
>>>
>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/authors/
>>
>> No, that's not how search engines work. They only add working URLs to
>> their index,
>
> Sure, but they need to find the URL first, and given how these "authors"
> URLs are typically private-email used, i wouldn't know where the
> search engines would find he URLs other than from the index URL.
>
>> and this is particularly strange since I helped the RPC
>> put site maps on the rfc-editor site that have the right URLs for all
>> of the RFCs.
>
> The site-map would list a URL like https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/authors/rfc9148.html
> given how its temporary... ?!
> ...

FWIW, this shows that it is a bad idea to name a publicly readable
resource RFCNNNN until the moment it get's published (so I believe the
RFC Editor should modify their naming convention).

Best regards, Julian

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email