IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Rfced-future] Up level [Re: AUTH48 and editing before approval]

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Thu, 02 April 2020 21:46 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E18E83A09AF for <rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 14:46:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MdDYarrKyh19 for <rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 14:46:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x536.google.com (mail-pg1-x536.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::536]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D05CC3A088F for <rfced-future@iab.org>; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 14:46:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x536.google.com with SMTP id l14so2483361pgb.1 for <rfced-future@iab.org>; Thu, 02 Apr 2020 14:46:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XmTm2KWeYl2T4Fiu2WPCnKwc70r+WbKu1YKLlRN72fg=; b=qHYh5uDiCeGlvdC6jbW2fRWLinIF8lkDryuqo5Q9+JjMqYF1kCBHmjh1U3uFKkUYZu x2qqsthuFR8jVOK81OCHjnUIRHgRC5Sptgkk7MkSnuN9ezpNZ7L+61UbGEY/E2pJICFJ FHLZKBpdZuDPRQBhALx0vey0XUKQdQLsn0iCAQxs/tPf4j91JekUGHuqzotQVeMK1L94 ubr2P88LWzSqABcCw1p00Tbj5jDK8FZ4egFjLqhcP2cjoPM9CsDHeZkYiDFSjyR9Qam/ iygYMW3VX8TdAzOKuHe73gTJ6Zzgcb4P/5WLh0Q6n44ZP0UUDU0LaVcxGa/LxSS0Qp8x MM/A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=XmTm2KWeYl2T4Fiu2WPCnKwc70r+WbKu1YKLlRN72fg=; b=FhxcngWr9/Y1OoxihNizADFnNhc3pmUHdl+9KN1uW/UNzQnjlEwbdTmprz5O5DCx3z qcGlnlOpnDqzkfBRi3CNNse+GSqRixoNJaeXKTJG0PMLN/z4fCcqBp0KmNpIvbVLVgdG c1waGBt9cswFa5j1fZHx7Z6o0mF4/pnNKIzFodIftcl3plYSE1s0dPxg6LKCpeXW+C9e ackwof4pKwIMxrPUumtuD2wFwm0+nPHk/C/Wg2ZQ18CcAumjNz8TywXm0zudZ7j/4IyY 4Iprp5O5/Ag6O3CEiLfpNE5ytrYFsOt0emzJ7IFXHEGCCVd6iRLDs263dwARhkLFhRVO v1EA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZVntjPgy7fhtpPiKmqTEmWmzmpS8CLGEgCNJRO/VGT1RcmDejb 3qW/2md39uuABjCvZeOA9gEUVJJG
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJ/gQrWeK7rCFvzNdOotq3PJt2xYflQOjH476Mqb94cslSKX5Vm8mmx8lQ+QiUkeD0dzfpzBw==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:fd4f:: with SMTP id m15mr5243651pgj.323.1585863984139; Thu, 02 Apr 2020 14:46:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.30] ([165.84.25.143]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u18sm4409945pfl.40.2020.04.02.14.46.20 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 02 Apr 2020 14:46:23 -0700 (PDT)
To: Eliot Lear <lear=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, rfced-future@iab.org, Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
References: <d95d9ca5-77d4-490d-1fe7-35b20db01016@joelhalpern.com> <4BC58577-8CC7-48CB-803F-F4E6E080188B@huitema.net> <75FEFDC1BB902A9091739F47@PSB> <DF85BBBB-B9D3-4852-89FC-0B971548A905@vigilsec.com> <E7A94449-BBC7-407B-820A-32DA6FBD7BF8@fugue.com> <BB1A84EB-2C05-42A6-A1B8-E0830695AC95@vigilsec.com> <B4BC8DD4-848A-4192-B1C5-7A66A7963976@fugue.com> <BB09DB5B-4E79-4739-9D58-F1D0D49D9BDD@tzi.org> <A5C7C919-4389-4D6E-82D0-6315456C8455@cisco.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <e48a264b-79df-d7ce-9820-73bda9f8130e@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2020 10:46:18 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <A5C7C919-4389-4D6E-82D0-6315456C8455@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfced-future/jh4Zh63_dV3mN0CWkDmkST2rcg8>
Subject: [Rfced-future] Up level [Re: AUTH48 and editing before approval]
X-BeenThere: rfced-future@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Editor Future Development Program <rfced-future.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfced-future/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfced-future@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2020 21:46:32 -0000

On 03-Apr-20 06:25, Eliot Lear wrote:
> All:
> 
> Can we distill the high level point that needs addressing in *this* process?
> 
> Are the touch points and flow the responsibility of the RFC Editor to define, or should that be this group?

Definitely the former. If we talk about such things here, we are already micro-managing at least as badly as the RSOC seems to have done. Actually, I'm simply deleting the thread at this point, so it's lucky I saw Eliot's question.

   Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email