Re: [rohc] New ROHC Milesstones.
Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> Fri, 11 September 2009 13:43 UTC
Return-Path: <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rohc@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rohc@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F8A23A6972 for <rohc@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 06:43:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.581
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.581 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.332, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IpAT0YsWkQAn for <rohc@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 06:43:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw5.ericsson.se (mailgw5.ericsson.se [193.180.251.36]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 644143A69C8 for <rohc@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 06:43:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb24-b7c01ae00000498b-29-4aaa540abee7
Received: from esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw5.ericsson.se (Symantec Brightmail Gateway) with SMTP id 93.05.18827.A045AAA4; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 15:43:38 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.254.174]) by esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 11 Sep 2009 15:43:37 +0200
Received: from [147.214.183.250] ([147.214.183.250]) by esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 11 Sep 2009 15:43:37 +0200
Message-ID: <4AAA5409.3040800@ericsson.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 15:43:37 +0200
From: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
References: <4AA8BA43.9030405@effnet.com> <4AAA3880.7050004@ericsson.com> <178B84E3-4115-43CC-BAE5-8E24522F9F9F@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <178B84E3-4115-43CC-BAE5-8E24522F9F9F@tzi.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Sep 2009 13:43:37.0795 (UTC) FILETIME=[DD771930:01CA32E5]
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Cc: "rohc@ietf.org" <rohc@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rohc] New ROHC Milesstones.
X-BeenThere: rohc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Robust Header Compression <rohc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc>, <mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rohc>
List-Post: <mailto:rohc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc>, <mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 13:43:03 -0000
Carsten Bormann skrev: > Magnus, > > I agree with all conclusions you have made. > > Let me, however, explain one thing for the record: > >> Regarding the milestone: >> Feb 2007 - ROHC encapsulation profile(s) for IPHC/CRTP/eCRTP submitted >> to IESG for publication as Proposed Standard >> >> This work was chartered on the 30th of August 2006. The only draft to >> fulfill the WG item ever submitted was >> draft-bormann-rohc-avt-crtp-profile-00. It was submitted in March 2007. >> Since then there has been zero progress on this. > > No progress was needed, since the spec is technically complete. > I never saw a need to update it. > >> This makes it clear >> that there are no energy nor interest for this WG item. > > There was lots of energy in 2007! > Energy trying to kill the idea. > (I still haven't heard a single technical reason why.) I think the main argument is technical to the extent that additional profiles for the same thing do reduce interoperability. But I can see how people equally interpret that as political. The motivation for creating CRTP profiles within ROHC was also primarily political. > >> That is why I >> will not hesitate a single second to kill that WG item. > > I fully agree. > > (Since one of the specs that might make use of the ROHC-CRTP bridge has > recently received new interest, I may want to pursue the draft in that > context.) > Can you expand on this. What do you mean with bridge? A gateway or more in the meaning of bridging over between ROCH and CRTP? Cheers Magnus Westerlund IETF Transport Area Director ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ericsson AB | Phone +46 10 7148287 Färögatan 6 | Mobile +46 73 0949079 SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com ----------------------------------------------------------------------
- [rohc] New ROHC Milesstones. Carl Knutsson
- Re: [rohc] New ROHC Milesstones. Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rohc] New ROHC Milesstones. Ghyslain Pelletier
- Re: [rohc] New ROHC Milesstones. Ghyslain Pelletier
- Re: [rohc] New ROHC Milesstones. Carl Knutsson
- Re: [rohc] New ROHC Milesstones. Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rohc] New ROHC Milesstones. pelle
- Re: [rohc] New ROHC Milesstones. Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rohc] New ROHC Milesstones. Emre Ertekin
- Re: [rohc] New ROHC Milesstones. Carl Knutsson
- Re: [rohc] New ROHC Milesstones. Carl Knutsson
- Re: [rohc] New ROHC Milesstones. Ghyslain Pelletier
- Re: [rohc] New ROHC Milesstones. Zhu Lei
- Re: [rohc] New ROHC Milesstones. Carl Knutsson
- Re: [rohc] New ROHC Milesstones. Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [rohc] New ROHC Milesstones. Carl Knutsson
- Re: [rohc] New ROHC Milesstones. Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rohc] New ROHC Milesstones. Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [rohc] New ROHC Milesstones. Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rohc] New ROHC Milesstones. Zhu Lei