IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rohc] New ROHC Milesstones.

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 10 September 2009 09:06 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: rohc@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rohc@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B53BE3A69DF for <rohc@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 02:06:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.744
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.744 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.505, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0TY+Fh+WC5E5 for <rohc@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 02:06:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9:209:3dff:fe00:7136]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 997203A6973 for <rohc@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 02:06:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.224.120]) by informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8A93NAT002001; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:03:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.0.1.198] (reingewinn.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.218.123]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72693BDD3; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:03:23 +0200 (CEST)
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
To: Carl Knutsson <carl.knutsson@effnet.com>
In-Reply-To: <4AA8BA43.9030405@effnet.com>
References: <4AA8BA43.9030405@effnet.com>
Message-Id: <FA75D17D-8CDE-4F20-9EBB-1BF884260737@tzi.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:03:22 +0200
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936)
Cc: "rohc@ietf.org" <rohc@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rohc] New ROHC Milesstones.
X-BeenThere: rohc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Robust Header Compression <rohc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc>, <mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rohc>
List-Post: <mailto:rohc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc>, <mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:06:35 -0000

On Sep 10, 2009, at 10:35, Carl Knutsson wrote:

> Feb 2007 - ROHC encapsulation profile(s) for IPHC/CRTP/eCRTP submitted
>           to IESG for publication as Proposed Standard

I wrote a draft for that,

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bormann-rohc-avt-crtp-profile-00

As far as I know, this is technically complete and could be submitted  
to WGLC.

> =This was added before I started as a chair and it is not completely
> clear to me what the consensus is for this item. I can't really see  
> what
> these new legacy profiles solve that can't be solved by existing
> profiles.

There are no new problems being solved, so much is true.
But they are solved in a different way, and possibly with different  
IPR considerations, based on existing IETF standards documents.
I can't speak to the IPR considerations (and I would not want to  
discuss them on the WG list), but I've heard that some people are  
interested in them in the hallway.

Gruesse, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email