IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rohc] New ROHC Milesstones.

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 10 September 2009 10:26 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: rohc@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rohc@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA973A6980 for <rohc@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 03:26:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.816
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.816 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.433, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jqhmyjCJTv+K for <rohc@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 03:26:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9:209:3dff:fe00:7136]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A5333A685E for <rohc@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 03:26:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.224.120]) by informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8AAQa7R026710; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:26:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.0.1.198] (reingewinn.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.218.123]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4425BE37; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:26:36 +0200 (CEST)
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
To: Carl Knutsson <carl.knutsson@effnet.com>
In-Reply-To: <4AA8D02E.5040803@effnet.com>
References: <4AA8BA43.9030405@effnet.com> <FA75D17D-8CDE-4F20-9EBB-1BF884260737@tzi.org> <130EBB38279E9847BAAAE0B8F9905F8C01CC832F@esealmw109.eemea.ericsson.se> <4AA8D02E.5040803@effnet.com>
Message-Id: <A05B856E-58AE-40DB-BC8C-5B9891D41825@tzi.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:26:36 +0200
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936)
Cc: rohc@ietf.org, Ghyslain Pelletier <ghyslain.pelletier@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [rohc] New ROHC Milesstones.
X-BeenThere: rohc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Robust Header Compression <rohc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc>, <mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rohc>
List-Post: <mailto:rohc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc>, <mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 10:26:17 -0000

On Sep 10, 2009, at 12:08, Carl Knutsson [without WG chair hat] wrote:

> I am having a hard time seeing any technical
> argument that would motivate these new profiles.

As I pointed out, there *is* no technical argument to be made for  
using legacy standards.

Unless you consider ease of deployment, availability of debugged  
implementations etc. a technical argument.

In the absence of a general solution to bridge legacy compression into  
ROHC, every HC-over-X document that is trying to get some real-world  
applicability has to provide the solution on its own.  Just like RFC  
4901 did.

The next one in line is
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bormann-rohc-over-802

I can certainly put in a legacy bridge there.  I'd rather use the one  
described in
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bormann-rohc-avt-crtp-profile-00

Gruesse, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email