Re: [Roll] Adoption of draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.txt as Working Group document ?

Hi Jerry,

On Aug 18, 2010, at 9:47 PM, Jerald.P.Martocci@jci.com wrote:

>
> Yes.  I would like the P2P draft promoted to a WG document.
>

Thanks for the feed-back.

> BTW.  Mukul's 'Measurement' draft

Which document are you referring to ?

Thanks.

JP.

> is really an excerpt from the original P2P draft.  It was extracted  
> as a separate document at the request of reviewers.  I think it  
> would be beneficial to reviewers if both documents were promoted to  
> WG level simultaneously since they complement each other.
>
> Jerry
>
>
> <mime-attachment.jpeg>
>
>
> From:	JP Vasseur <jpv@cisco.com>
> To:	ROLL WG <roll@ietf.org>
> Date:	08/18/2010 02:30 PM
> Subject:	[Roll] Adoption of draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.txt as Working  
> Group        document ?
>
>
>
>
> Dear all,
>
> draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.txt has been presented several times and
> discussed on the mailing list. Could you let us know whether or not
> you think that draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.txt should be adopted as a
> ROLL Working Group document (feel free to justify) ?
>
> Thanks.
>
> JP.
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>
>