Re: [Roll] Adoption of draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.txt as WorkingGroup document ?

[Emmanuel Baccelli <[e-mail]>]

+1 too.

On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Anders Brandt <[e-mail]> wrote:

>  +1
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] *On Behalf Of
> *[e-mail]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 18, 2010 21:48
> *To:* JP Vasseur
> *Cc:* ROLL WG; [e-mail]
> *Subject:* Re: [Roll] Adoption of draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.txt as
> WorkingGroup document ?
>
>
> Yes.  I would like the P2P draft promoted to a WG document.
>
> BTW.  Mukul's 'Measurement' draft is really an excerpt from the original
> P2P draft.  It was extracted as a separate document at the request of
> reviewers.  I think it would be beneficial to reviewers if both documents
> were promoted to WG level simultaneously since they complement each other.
>
> Jerry
>
>
>
>
>
>   From: JP Vasseur <[e-mail]> To: ROLL WG <[e-mail]> Date: 08/18/2010
> 02:30 PM Subject: [Roll] Adoption of draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.txt as
> Working Group        document ?
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> Dear all,
>
> draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.txt has been presented several times and
> discussed on the mailing list. Could you let us know whether or not
> you think that draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.txt should be adopted as a
> ROLL Working Group document (feel free to justify) ?
>
> Thanks.
>
> JP.
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>
>