Re: [Roll] Adoption of draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.txt as Working Group document ?

David Culler <culler@cs.berkeley.edu> Fri, 20 August 2010 16:48 UTC

Return-Path: <culler@cs.berkeley.edu>
X-Original-To: roll@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F77D3A6AA7 for <roll@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 09:48:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I2qOApI9SYXb for <roll@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 09:48:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gateway0.EECS.Berkeley.EDU (gateway0.EECS.Berkeley.EDU [169.229.60.87]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D0593A695B for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 09:48:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.71.0.130] ([12.157.151.170]) (authenticated bits=0) by gateway0.EECS.Berkeley.EDU (8.14.4/8.13.5) with ESMTP id o7KGmh2C004082 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 20 Aug 2010 09:48:44 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: David Culler <culler@cs.berkeley.edu>
In-Reply-To: <2FC6E0A9-2728-40D5-ADA8-A9E5BFC10656@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 09:48:43 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <39D9881C-818C-4229-907F-E249500EA4CE@cs.berkeley.edu>
References: <2FC6E0A9-2728-40D5-ADA8-A9E5BFC10656@cisco.com>
To: JP Vasseur <jpv@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Cc: ROLL WG <roll@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Roll] Adoption of draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.txt as Working Group document ?
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 16:48:32 -0000

Sounds like the hum to me.

On Aug 18, 2010, at 12:30 PM, JP Vasseur wrote:

> Dear all,
> 
> draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.txt has been presented several times and discussed on the mailing list. Could you let us know whether or not you think that draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.txt should be adopted as a ROLL Working Group document (feel free to justify) ?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> JP.
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll