Re: [Roll] Adoption of draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.txt as Working Group document ?

[[e-mail]]

Sorry for the confusion.  I sent this email out before realizing that Mukul has yet to post the 'measurement' draft.  He plans to post today (Thursday).

From:	JP Vasseur <[e-mail]>
To:	[e-mail]
Cc:	ROLL WG <[e-mail]>, [e-mail]
Date:	08/18/2010 04:30 PM
Subject:	Re: [Roll] Adoption of draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.txt as Working Group document ?

---

Hi Jerry,

On Aug 18, 2010, at 9:47 PM, [e-mail] wrote:


Yes.  I would like the P2P draft promoted to a WG document.  


Thanks for the feed-back.

BTW.  Mukul's 'Measurement' draft

Which document are you referring to ?

Thanks.

JP.

is really an excerpt from the original P2P draft.  It was extracted as a separate document at the request of reviewers.  I think it would be beneficial to reviewers if both documents were promoted to WG level simultaneously since they complement each other.

Jerry


<mime-attachment.jpeg>

From:	JP Vasseur <[e-mail]>
To:	ROLL WG <[e-mail]>
Date:	08/18/2010 02:30 PM
Subject:	[Roll] Adoption of draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.txt as Working Group        document ?

---

Dear all,

draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.txt has been presented several times and  
discussed on the mailing list. Could you let us know whether or not  
you think that draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.txt should be adopted as a  
ROLL Working Group document (feel free to justify) ?

Thanks.

JP.
_______________________________________________
Roll mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll" rel="nofollow">https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll