IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] Adoption of draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.txt as WorkingGroup document ?

"Samita Chakrabarti" <samitac@ipinfusion.com> Thu, 19 August 2010 19:59 UTC

Return-Path: <samitac@ipinfusion.com>
X-Original-To: roll@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5274C3A69E7 for <roll@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 12:59:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.887
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.887 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.376, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Eie7GznGl-6e for <roll@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 12:59:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp128.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com (smtp128.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com [69.147.65.187]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 3832B3A693E for <roll@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 12:59:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 20751 invoked from network); 19 Aug 2010 20:00:28 -0000
Received: from samitacD630 (samitac@65.223.109.250 with login) by smtp128.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 19 Aug 2010 13:00:28 -0700 PDT
X-Yahoo-SMTP: 2TubM6mswBDzS84mnP14_Gq9MWTFqPrD9YAsl.JSPFAWkA--
X-YMail-OSG: v._RNVUVM1kgiELzLV.U52vXCqnVrY0vWNG53NeYHPOztJU DoO69oT0nu_iTlU0feGGxr6bSv5PgzxOZ3f1pAC092Jjyu1tC9xt3WYvw5fo Fw6jNX6WmRblI8lCCh0OVSdUimYL4a24CF_F.0W5Qe6ObX1caACulA9_sNB0 NZn_lEI_0S8gk0F3xZ1wNs4O5mTyKouEvXwgdJ4OAMVyIycZRfvbm9Srlqpt kApILjzBS_qqYO8JNL4fH1BSo9SfdH8tA3JbKjFDvKaeKZOFbwUU3_0jfna8 5dUhJCZWt_D7_gFxhX_oG
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
From: Samita Chakrabarti <samitac@ipinfusion.com>
To: 'ROLL WG' <roll@ietf.org>
References: <2FC6E0A9-2728-40D5-ADA8-A9E5BFC10656@cisco.com> <OFFD26D9E1.C83D806A-ON86257783.006C3E1C-86257783.006CB8A5@jci.com> <6D9687E95918C04A8B30A7D6DA805A3E01CCD2D7@zensys17.zensys.local> <AANLkTi=5XBrhG7vjXNER51Xn-r6uYoObDzoZh1rj4fft@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=5XBrhG7vjXNER51Xn-r6uYoObDzoZh1rj4fft@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 13:00:27 -0700
Message-ID: <00c601cb3fd9$2b79d950$826d8bf0$@com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00C7_01CB3F9E.7F1B0150"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Acs/cZL7i+JNAiECQQiGXg6a0gKrJwAZnchQ
Content-Language: en-us
Subject: Re: [Roll] Adoption of draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.txt as WorkingGroup document ?
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 19:59:57 -0000

Hi Mukul, JP,

 

I support this document as well toward a wg document.

 

One interesting observation: One can understand the basic RPL operation from
this draft much better than the actual RPL draft.  The unnecessary long text
in RPL-draft is indeed an issue to any readers anywhere in the world.

 

Regards,

-Samita

 

From: roll-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:roll-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Emmanuel Baccelli
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 12:40 AM
To: ROLL WG
Subject: Re: [Roll] Adoption of draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.txt as WorkingGroup
document ?

 

+1 too.

On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Anders Brandt <abr@sdesigns.dk> wrote:

+1

 

  _____  

From: roll-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:roll-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Jerald.P.Martocci@jci.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2010 21:48
To: JP Vasseur
Cc: ROLL WG; roll-bounces@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Roll] Adoption of draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.txt as WorkingGroup
document ?


Yes.  I would like the P2P draft promoted to a WG document.   

BTW.  Mukul's 'Measurement' draft is really an excerpt from the original P2P
draft.  It was extracted as a separate document at the request of reviewers.
I think it would be beneficial to reviewers if both documents were promoted
to WG level simultaneously since they complement each other. 

Jerry 







From: 

JP Vasseur <jpv@cisco.com> 


To: 

ROLL WG <roll@ietf.org> 


Date: 

08/18/2010 02:30 PM 


Subject: 

[Roll] Adoption of draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.txt as Working Group
document ?

 

  _____  




Dear all,

draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.txt has been presented several times and  
discussed on the mailing list. Could you let us know whether or not  
you think that draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.txt should be adopted as a  
ROLL Working Group document (feel free to justify) ?

Thanks.

JP.
_______________________________________________
Roll mailing list
Roll@ietf.org
 <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll




_______________________________________________
Roll mailing list
Roll@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email