IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] Poll for WG adoption of mrhof

"JeongGil Ko (John)" <jgko@cs.jhu.edu> Mon, 04 October 2010 19:59 UTC

Return-Path: <jeonggil.ko@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C9783A708C for <roll@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 12:59:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VGFw7Y3Nh2UV for <roll@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 12:59:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qy0-f172.google.com (mail-qy0-f172.google.com [209.85.216.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B535F3A7086 for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 12:59:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qyk5 with SMTP id 5so1862047qyk.10 for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 13:00:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:subject:mime-version :content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding :message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=kckgGFB38+1Wv6v+s65X/Qqb33k1OJnpxMSYEmROGFM=; b=TDLPWfzOG1olGeh17KAQJNvBcCyQQlWs/VYs2Bnuw6h90gB+6p/cdJ6fPw4teLuj5y eItuh8ZrOgXFVoHh4OPs4MjJf3v1AJfKN68g+wwYM614mge75ozHj9X/6jM+C0oZOHr9 E91Qd1v8dQ2SKNZFghvgFbo+ndZHo8oGQpMbM=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=CHjU3VH+dirEamKFKay0KJava5t+A2utKyCYS6JBFjazADb8yzTdiRfO0FU3FE10qx iCXpkR1rE0D4Upm9P3b7hzPqqOeSZUOMh+R7VVhEd8gdFT0ksu54ANUhu+8wCQiRh6Sx vhN95qGPUWneopg5DdeotV84AvCdav5ieLmzM=
Received: by 10.229.95.66 with SMTP id c2mr7416186qcn.85.1286222445451; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 13:00:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jgko.cs.jhu.edu (jgko.cs.jhu.edu [128.220.71.105]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t18sm5939460qco.32.2010.10.04.13.00.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 04 Oct 2010 13:00:44 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: "JeongGil (John) Ko" <jeonggil.ko@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1078)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: "JeongGil Ko (John)" <jgko@cs.jhu.edu>
In-Reply-To: <1505D652-1EBE-4325-B76F-4730F25DB6AB@cs.stanford.edu>
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2010 16:00:43 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <9298D2D0-9914-43AA-B5F7-2CF0A6653697@cs.jhu.edu>
References: <1449628946.109107.1285165358794.JavaMail.root@mail02.pantherlink.uwm.edu> <1505D652-1EBE-4325-B76F-4730F25DB6AB@cs.stanford.edu>
To: Philip Levis <pal@cs.stanford.edu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1078)
Cc: roll <roll@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Roll] Poll for WG adoption of mrhof
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2010 19:59:51 -0000

Any more updates on this poll? Or is a new poll planning to be initiated by the chairs? 

-John

On Sep 22, 2010, at 10:36 AM, Philip Levis wrote:

> Ah, ok. Clearly my memory is faulty! Thanks for the clarification.
> 
> Phil
> 
> (sent from a phone)
> 
> On Sep 22, 2010, at 9:22 AM, Mukul Goyal <mukul@uwm.edu> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Phil,
>> 
>>> Sure, sorry about that. I saw Mukul poll for the p2p draft so thought I would do so as well. For future reference, is this an official part of IETF process or just something you'd prefer (happy to go along)?
>> 
>> Here are the emails regarding my request for WG status for p2p draft and the actual poll that JP initiated. Looking at the emails, one can argue both ways whether I initiated the poll or JP did. But the truth is that people responded only to JP's message. My message received a grand total of zero responses.
>> 
>> :)
>> 
>> Mukul
>> 
>> ----- Forwarded Message -----
>> From: "Mukul Goyal" <mukul@uwm.edu>
>> To: "roll" <roll@ietf.org>
>> Sent: Sunday, August 8, 2010 9:32:57 PM
>> Subject: [Roll] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> Here is the new version of the P2P draft. It takes in account all the comments received so far.
>> 
>> I would like to request WG status for the draft.
>> 
>> Comments welcome.
>> 
>> Regards
>> Mukul
>> 
>> 
>> ----- Forwarded Message -----
>> From: "JP Vasseur" <jpv@cisco.com>
>> To: "ROLL WG" <roll@ietf.org>
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2010 2:30:09 PM
>> Subject: [Roll] Adoption of draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.txt as Working Group    document ?
>> 
>> Dear all,
>> 
>> draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.txt has been presented several times and
>> discussed on the mailing list. Could you let us know whether or not
>> you think that draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.txt should be adopted as a
>> ROLL Working Group document (feel free to justify) ?
>> 
>> Thanks.
>> 
>> JP.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Roll mailing list
>> Roll@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
> 

------
JeongGil Ko (John)
Ph.D. Student
Department of Computer Science
Johns Hopkins University
http://www.cs.jhu.edu/~jgko

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email