IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] Adoption of draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.txt as Working Group document ?

Mukul Goyal <mukul@uwm.edu> Wed, 18 August 2010 20:27 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=839f6dbf6=mukul@uwm.edu>
X-Original-To: roll@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0CE93A67FC; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 13:27:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.152
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.152 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.553, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24XoraL16XcV; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 13:27:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ip1mta.uwm.edu (ip1mta.uwm.edu [129.89.7.18]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 459493A67FB; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 13:27:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta04.pantherlink.uwm.edu ([129.89.7.101]) by ip1mta.uwm.edu with ESMTP; 18 Aug 2010 15:27:51 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mta04.pantherlink.uwm.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27A3E2B3F12; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 15:27:21 -0500 (CDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mta04.pantherlink.uwm.edu
Received: from mta04.pantherlink.uwm.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta04.pantherlink.uwm.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GUPwc7IGM9Tc; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 15:27:20 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mail02.pantherlink.uwm.edu (mail02.pantherlink.uwm.edu [129.89.7.86]) by mta04.pantherlink.uwm.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD27E2B3F16; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 15:27:19 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 15:27:49 -0500
From: Mukul Goyal <mukul@uwm.edu>
To: Jerald P Martocci <Jerald.P.Martocci@jci.com>
Message-ID: <1829314419.698587.1282163269233.JavaMail.root@mail02.pantherlink.uwm.edu>
In-Reply-To: <OFFD26D9E1.C83D806A-ON86257783.006C3E1C-86257783.006CB8A5@jci.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_698585_872095612.1282163269231"
X-Originating-IP: [129.89.7.92]
X-Mailer: Zimbra 6.0.7_GA_2473.RHEL4_64 (ZimbraWebClient - IE8 (Win)/6.0.7_GA_2473.RHEL4_64)
X-Authenticated-User: mukul@uwm.edu
Cc: ROLL WG <roll@ietf.org>, roll-bounces@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Roll] Adoption of draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.txt as Working Group document ?
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 20:27:19 -0000

Jerry

Sorry for the confusion. The measurement draft is not yet posted. I will do so as soon as I can.

Thanks
Mukul

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jerald P Martocci" <Jerald.P.Martocci@jci.com>
To: "JP Vasseur" <jpv@cisco.com>
Cc: "ROLL WG" <roll@ietf.org>, roll-bounces@ietf.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2010 2:47:42 PM
Subject: Re: [Roll] Adoption of draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.txt as Working	Group	document ?



Yes.  I would like the P2P draft promoted to a WG document.   

BTW.  Mukul's 'Measurement' draft is really an excerpt from the original P2P draft.  It was extracted as a separate document at the request of reviewers.  I think it would be beneficial to reviewers if both documents were promoted to WG level simultaneously since they complement each other. 

Jerry 





From: 	JP Vasseur <jpv@cisco.com> 
To: 	ROLL WG <roll@ietf.org> 
Date: 	08/18/2010 02:30 PM 
Subject: 	[Roll] Adoption of draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.txt as Working Group        document ? 




Dear all, 

draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.txt has been presented several times and   
discussed on the mailing list. Could you let us know whether or not   
you think that draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.txt should be adopted as a   
ROLL Working Group document (feel free to justify) ? 

Thanks. 

JP. 
_______________________________________________ 
Roll mailing list 
Roll@ietf.org 
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll 



_______________________________________________
Roll mailing list
Roll@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email