Re: [Roll] Poll for WG adoption of mrhof
Mukul Goyal <mukul@uwm.edu> Wed, 22 September 2010 14:22 UTC
Return-Path: <prvs=8748beeb6=mukul@uwm.edu>
X-Original-To: roll@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DC493A6AD4 for <roll@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 07:22:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.533
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.533 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.066, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GR-wwPuj6KaU for <roll@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 07:22:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ip2mta.uwm.edu (ip2mta.uwm.edu [129.89.7.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C5FF3A6A87 for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 07:22:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta03.pantherlink.uwm.edu ([129.89.7.134]) by ip2mta.uwm.edu with ESMTP; 22 Sep 2010 09:22:39 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mta03.pantherlink.uwm.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F9DF1FD05E; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 09:22:39 -0500 (CDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mta03.pantherlink.uwm.edu
Received: from mta03.pantherlink.uwm.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta03.pantherlink.uwm.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RMWNRhXUUZOS; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 09:22:38 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mail02.pantherlink.uwm.edu (mail02.pantherlink.uwm.edu [129.89.7.86]) by mta03.pantherlink.uwm.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8C101FD093; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 09:22:38 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 09:22:38 -0500
From: Mukul Goyal <mukul@uwm.edu>
To: roll <roll@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <1449628946.109107.1285165358794.JavaMail.root@mail02.pantherlink.uwm.edu>
In-Reply-To: <2FC6E0A9-2728-40D5-ADA8-A9E5BFC10656@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [129.89.7.92]
X-Mailer: Zimbra 6.0.7_GA_2473.RHEL5_64 (ZimbraWebClient - IE8 (Win)/6.0.7_GA_2473.RHEL5_64)
X-Authenticated-User: mukul@uwm.edu
Subject: Re: [Roll] Poll for WG adoption of mrhof
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 14:22:14 -0000
Hi Phil, >Sure, sorry about that. I saw Mukul poll for the p2p draft so thought I would do so as well. For future reference, is this an official part of IETF process or just something you'd prefer (happy to go along)? Here are the emails regarding my request for WG status for p2p draft and the actual poll that JP initiated. Looking at the emails, one can argue both ways whether I initiated the poll or JP did. But the truth is that people responded only to JP's message. My message received a grand total of zero responses. :) Mukul ----- Forwarded Message ----- From: "Mukul Goyal" <mukul@uwm.edu> To: "roll" <roll@ietf.org> Sent: Sunday, August 8, 2010 9:32:57 PM Subject: [Roll] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02 Hi all, Here is the new version of the P2P draft. It takes in account all the comments received so far. I would like to request WG status for the draft. Comments welcome. Regards Mukul ----- Forwarded Message ----- From: "JP Vasseur" <jpv@cisco.com> To: "ROLL WG" <roll@ietf.org> Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2010 2:30:09 PM Subject: [Roll] Adoption of draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.txt as Working Group document ? Dear all, draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.txt has been presented several times and discussed on the mailing list. Could you let us know whether or not you think that draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.txt should be adopted as a ROLL Working Group document (feel free to justify) ? Thanks. JP. _______________________________________________ Roll mailing list Roll@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
- [Roll] Adoption of draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.txt a… JP Vasseur
- Re: [Roll] Adoption of draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.t… Jerald.P.Martocci
- Re: [Roll] Adoption of draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.t… Don Sturek
- Re: [Roll] Adoption of draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.t… Philip Levis
- Re: [Roll] Adoption of draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.t… Philip Levis
- Re: [Roll] Adoption of draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.t… JeongGil Ko (John)
- Re: [Roll] Adoption of draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.t… Mukul Goyal
- Re: [Roll] Adoption of draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.t… JP Vasseur
- Re: [Roll] Adoption of draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.t… Anders Brandt
- Re: [Roll] Adoption of draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.t… Emmanuel Baccelli
- Re: [Roll] Adoption of draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.t… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Roll] Adoption of draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.t… Ulrich Herberg
- Re: [Roll] Adoption of draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.t… Jerald.P.Martocci
- Re: [Roll] Adoption of draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.t… Zach Shelby
- Re: [Roll] Adoption of draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.t… Samita Chakrabarti
- Re: [Roll] Adoption of draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.t… dominique.barthel
- Re: [Roll] Adoption of draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.t… David Culler
- Re: [Roll] Adoption of draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.t… Robert Cragie
- Re: [Roll] Poll for WG adoption of mrhof Mukul Goyal
- Re: [Roll] Poll for WG adoption of mrhof Philip Levis
- Re: [Roll] Poll for WG adoption of mrhof JeongGil Ko (John)