Re: [Roll] Adoption of draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.txt as WorkingGroup document ?

["Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <[e-mail]>]

Same here, +1

 

Pascal

 

From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of
Emmanuel Baccelli
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 9:40 AM
To: ROLL WG
Subject: Re: [Roll] Adoption of draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.txt as
WorkingGroup document ?

 

+1 too.

On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Anders Brandt <[e-mail]> wrote:

+1

	 

________________________________

	From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On
Behalf Of [e-mail]
	Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2010 21:48
	To: JP Vasseur
	Cc: ROLL WG; [e-mail]
	Subject: Re: [Roll] Adoption of draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.txt as
WorkingGroup document ?

	
	Yes.  I would like the P2P draft promoted to a WG document.   
	
	BTW.  Mukul's 'Measurement' draft is really an excerpt from the
original P2P draft.  It was extracted as a separate document at the
request of reviewers.  I think it would be beneficial to reviewers if
both documents were promoted to WG level simultaneously since they
complement each other. 
	
	Jerry 
	
	
	 
	
	

From: 

JP Vasseur <[e-mail]> 

To: 

ROLL WG <[e-mail]> 

Date: 

08/18/2010 02:30 PM 

Subject: 

[Roll] Adoption of draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.txt as Working Group
document ?

	 

________________________________

	
	
	
	Dear all,
	
	draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.txt has been presented several times
and  
	discussed on the mailing list. Could you let us know whether or
not  
	you think that draft-dt-roll-p2p-rpl-02.txt should be adopted as
a  
	ROLL Working Group document (feel free to justify) ?
	
	Thanks.
	
	JP.
	_______________________________________________
	Roll mailing list
	[e-mail]
	https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll> 
	
	


_______________________________________________
Roll mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll