Re: [Roll] Adoption of draft-goyal-roll-rpl-compression as a new ROLL WG document

C Chauvenet <c.chauvenet@watteco.com> Fri, 02 September 2011 10:20 UTC

Return-Path: <c.chauvenet@watteco.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83A4121F8F46 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 03:20:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.600, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xWhHDKi+-PM0 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 03:20:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from TX2EHSOBE006.bigfish.com (tx2ehsobe003.messaging.microsoft.com [65.55.88.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D381621F8F47 for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 03:20:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail195-tx2-R.bigfish.com (10.9.14.242) by TX2EHSOBE006.bigfish.com (10.9.40.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.22; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 10:22:26 +0000
Received: from mail195-tx2 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail195-tx2-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2834D19046F; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 10:22:26 +0000 (UTC)
X-SpamScore: -23
X-BigFish: VPS-23(z1725nzc89bh1432N98dKzz1202hzz8275ch1033IL8275dhz2dh2a8h668h839h8aah61h)
X-Spam-TCS-SCL: 0:0
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:213.199.187.153; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPVD:NLI; SRV:BULK; H:IE2RD2HUB001.red002.local; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
Received: from mail195-tx2 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail195-tx2 (MessageSwitch) id 1314958944747578_8515; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 10:22:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from TX2EHSMHS023.bigfish.com (unknown [10.9.14.247]) by mail195-tx2.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A72AD10046; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 10:22:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from IE2RD2HUB001.red002.local (213.199.187.153) by TX2EHSMHS023.bigfish.com (10.9.99.123) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.22; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 10:22:24 +0000
Received: from IE2RD2XVS211.red002.local ([172.18.6.55]) by IE2RD2HUB001.red002.local ([10.33.16.61]) with mapi; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 03:22:09 -0700
From: C Chauvenet <c.chauvenet@watteco.com>
To: "Angelo P. Castellani" <angelo@castellani.net>
Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 03:22:07 -0700
Thread-Topic: [Roll] Adoption of draft-goyal-roll-rpl-compression as a new ROLL WG document
Thread-Index: AcxpWivWODIkUV7NTS6Q5qXQkL8MYA==
Message-ID: <F34E7478-B58E-49E0-8F11-3CE6DBCC2BEB@watteco.com>
References: <1483809161.144962.1314763722334.JavaMail.root@mail05.pantherlink.uwm.edu> <4884.1314797912@marajade.sandelman.ca> <AFA379AA-7AB8-4106-BDEF-030AAEC984E6@thomasclausen.org> <8CA251EF-2842-453A-964A-E3F30713917A@cisco.com> <2507C27F-0589-488C-902F-52B55A0FCE49@thomasclausen.org> <24100.1314827183@marajade.sandelman.ca> <CAPxkH3hoQnt=Ks6ccAqwR5KPaRSanPmhh3py4dTL2qU35Z7vQw@mail.gmail.com> <CAPxkH3gMNdKR_mC9jqvyNJQK3B1fEVFv8x9rGJpm+n7KJeJ+dg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPxkH3gMNdKR_mC9jqvyNJQK3B1fEVFv8x9rGJpm+n7KJeJ+dg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: watteco.com
Cc: roll WG <roll@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Roll] Adoption of draft-goyal-roll-rpl-compression as a new ROLL WG document
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 10:20:56 -0000

Hi, 

Because RPL is a Route-Over routing protocol, it is applicable to many different L1/L2, including the well-known 802.14.5 and their last improvements/updates, PLC  and many others ...

Thus, I think we should avoid to bind RPL to some specifics L1/L2, or we would need to update RPL for each new L1/L2 created that aim to use RPL.

Cédric.

Le 1 sept. 2011 à 10:32, Angelo P. Castellani a écrit :

> I slightly changed my mind about this +1.
> 
> Probably a good way to avoid this problem is to require the update of
> the RPL packet format only for those mediums where the use of a
> synthetic packet formats is a strong requirement (e.g. 802.15.4).
> 
> As detailed in , the conditions can be characterized in a more general
> way, avoiding referencing single technologies in the standard:
> "If the L2 medium does not support frames longer than X, than only the
> synthetic packet format MUST be used."
> 
> In this way we avoid manual configuration and supporting both formats
> in devices that target implementing this spec on very limited L2
> medium.
> 
> In other words, synthetic packet format should be a MUST for some
> lower layer technologies characterized by some parameters (without
> referencing specific technologies).
> 
> Best,
> Angelo
> 
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 10:03, Angelo P. Castellani
> <angelo@castellani.net> wrote:
>> +1
>> 
>> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 23:46, Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> wrote:
>>> 
>>>>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Heide Clausen <ietf@thomasclausen.org> writes:
>>>    Thomas> I'd much like a routing protocol, designed for low-power,
>>>    Thomas> lossy networks and with low-MTU MACs as one of its
>>>    Thomas> design-target to be able to run over these networks. If
>>>    Thomas> _this_ early a need for an alternative, more compact, packet
>>>    Thomas> format is identified, then by all means let's get RPL
>>>    Thomas> updated to use that alternative, more compact, packet
>>>    Thomas> format. I have absolutely no problems with that.
>>> 
>>> +1
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Roll mailing list
>>> Roll@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>>> 
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>