IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] Adoption of draft-goyal-roll-rpl-compression as a new ROLL WG document

Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> Sun, 04 September 2011 16:09 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31BFE21F855D for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 09:09:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.688
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.688 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.650, BAYES_00=-2.599, DATE_IN_PAST_12_24=0.992, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N3LOhGqCMsDZ for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 09:09:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [67.23.6.41]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3AFB21F855A for <roll@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 09:09:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from marajade.sandelman.ca (unknown [208.85.219.206]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AB81342F6 for <roll@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 12:10:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from marajade.sandelman.ca (marajade.sandelman.ca [127.0.0.1]) by marajade.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FA8098C7A for <roll@ietf.org>; Sat, 3 Sep 2011 22:36:15 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
To: roll WG <roll@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <1128231318.183084.1315061250217.JavaMail.root@mail05.pantherlink.uwm.edu>
References: <1128231318.183084.1315061250217.JavaMail.root@mail05.pantherlink.uwm.edu>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.1; nmh 1.3-dev; XEmacs 21.4 (patch 22)
Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2011 22:36:15 -0400
Message-ID: <16050.1315103775@marajade.sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Subject: Re: [Roll] Adoption of draft-goyal-roll-rpl-compression as a new ROLL WG document
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 16:09:27 -0000

>>>>> "Mukul" == Mukul Goyal <mukul@uwm.edu> writes:
    Mukul> There was a lot of opposition to adding more stuff to core
    Mukul> RPL. The (valid) argument was that any further additions
    Mukul> would be introduced as supplementary documents. Now that core
    Mukul> RPL is (almost) done, objections in the name of
    Mukul> interoperability are being raised to deny useful extensions
    Mukul> of the protocol and even to attack the core protocol
    Mukul> itself. I find it to be a sorry state of affairs.

The issue Mukul is that GRRC is not an addition to RPL, it is a
replacement.


(I don't know who "IetfRoll@yahoo.com" is, it would be nice if you could
use a real name, or at least use a useful pseudonym)

-- 
]       He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life!           |  firewalls  [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON    |net architect[
] mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
   Kyoto Plus: watch the video <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzx1ycLXQSE>
	               then sign the petition.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email