Re: [rtcweb] SDP Offer/Answer draft-jennings-rtcweb-signaling

Cullen,

Thanks for the clarification about ROAP dialog stateful in signaling
gateway & Session-id usage.  Please update this information in the next
revision. 

Thanks
Partha

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Cullen Jennings [mailto:fluffy@cisco.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2011 12:12 AM
>To: Ravindran Parthasarathi
>Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org; public-webrtc@w3.org; Jonathan Rosenberg
>Subject: Re: [rtcweb] SDP Offer/Answer draft-jennings-rtcweb-signaling
>
>
>So I might have messed up the draft a bit. I'm fine with things can be
>implemented as dialog statefull, what I want is that it is possible to
>make a signaling gateway that is only transaction statefull. I'm fine
if
>some signaling gateways are built as dialog statefull.
>
> (As a side note, some B2BUA are effectively transaction statefull but
>that is pretty rare )
>
>
>On Oct 17, 2011, at 15:28 , Ravindran Parthasarathi wrote:
>
>> Cullen/Joanthan,
>>
>> I like your proposed idea as it is going in the direction of having
>> "standard" signaling protocol for RTCWeb. I'm seeing your proposal as
>> SDP offer/answer over websocket and the proposal helps to easy
gateway
>> development between RTCWeb server and legacy signaling protocols.
>>
>> I have fundamental question in the proposal as it proposes RTCWeb
>server
>> as SIP proxy equivalent and in reality, unfortunately most of the SIP
>> deployment work is based on B2BUA. The question is whether RTCWeb
>server
>> shall be dialog-state or MUST be transaction-stateful only.
>>
>> Also, session-id in the draft is used to uniquely understand the
>offerer
>> and answerer in the transaction or session. In case it is session,
how
>> to indicate the termination of the session.
>>
>
>My personal opinion is that to be able to clean up all the state in a
>clean an easy way, we should add some message to indicate the SDP offer
>/ answer state and related media streams can be discarded.  I'd like to
>add that to the next version.
>
>
>> Thanks
>> Partha
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On
>> Behalf
>>> Of Cullen Jennings
>>> Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2011 8:39 AM
>>> To: rtcweb@ietf.org; public-webrtc@w3.org
>>> Cc: Jonathan Rosenberg
>>> Subject: [rtcweb] SDP Offer/Answer draft-jennings-rtcweb-signaling
>>>
>>>
>>> Jonathan and I submitted a new draft on setting up media based on
the
>>> SDP Offer/Answer model. The ASCII flows are a bit hard to read so
>until
>>> I update them, I recommend reading the PDF version at
>>>
>>> http://tools.ietf.org/pdf/draft-jennings-rtcweb-signaling-00.pdf
>>>
>>> Clearly the draft is an early stage but we plan to revise it before
>the
>>> deadline for the IETF 82. Love to get input - particularly on if
this
>>> looks like generally the right direction to go.
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rtcweb mailing list
>>> rtcweb@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb