[rtcweb] Draft name change: draft-holmberg-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation-00 [was: API options for supporting fork with ROAP (Re: SDP Offer/Answer draft-jennings-rtcweb-signaling]

[Christer Holmberg <[e-mail]>]

Hi,
 
>> Now we're getting into the stuff that is not my home turf :). 
>> But as I understand it, the current assumption is that the browser would in 
>> fact only open one port which all RTP streams use. In most 
>> cases all streams would be multiplexed over the same 5-tuple, but the 
>> other end (if it is not a browser) could open separate ports for each RTP 
>> stream, if it (read legacy) would like to avoid multiplexing.
>> Actually my current understanding is that in all cases, all 
>> video components of all MediaStreams would use the same RTP 
>> session, and all audio components of all MediaStreams would 
>> use the same RTP session.
> 
> If the TOGETHER extension (draft-alvestrand-one-rtp) or 
> BONDING extension (next version of draft-holmberg-mmusic-sdp-multiplex-negotiation; 
> the name changed) is supported, both media types would be sent across 
> one RTP session.

Actually, BUNDLE is the name of the new extension :)

Due to the name change of the extension, the name of the draft has also changed.

The name is now: draft-holmberg-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation-00.

http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-holmberg-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation-00.txt

Note that Harald is now co-author of the draft.

Regards,

Christer