IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Question about ICE-Lite server

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Mon, 07 July 2014 09:03 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D7281B27EA for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 02:03:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D_chaAZfnxxy for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 02:03:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sesbmg22.ericsson.net (sesbmg22.ericsson.net [193.180.251.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89D951B27E0 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 02:03:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb30-f79da6d000006b80-b7-53ba62593b31
Received: from ESESSHC022.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by sesbmg22.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 4A.97.27520.9526AB35; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 11:03:21 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.4]) by ESESSHC022.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.84]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 11:03:20 +0200
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Question about ICE-Lite server
Thread-Index: AQHPl4oNJSaeycfS3EWkey3p+g1y9puSUgAAgAAJ6QCAADirgIAAQNmAgAAHoQCAAAlOAIAAAyCAgAFrm24=
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 09:03:20 +0000
Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D3B608F@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <CALiegf=kLtiUKoue=ahXP4fUhLJNNd8vCaQTECQxjK5R7cjLTQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxv8s5-FNR-kq0C01H_Ev39cyBs5P__Pd-0cmCXDFYy-YQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBPV_iVcSmi+ndDaYY6zX=F7TRoSDFqe5hzJP3-NjZ7Y1w@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegf=CMAOwVF3=gNY9qrsTfsEwuiwvGZ_1SaS0waOUE83-Ug@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBMPyT4y1v12O5pb7Khs2ge0pgjUugrBS0NoK8=SLOScxQ@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfmjywprsFvsQg10S0nGw08XhuCAjDrqgx2=ZfV-T6_PVA@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBM+ywkbXbE6=fz7Z9kmZkpsqW385kntoXW2RAR1eaWu1A@mail.gmail.com>, <CALiegf=_6je5kqwPETMGmU+tznypJLEnTdvMa2+i5Nae=t9vTA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALiegf=_6je5kqwPETMGmU+tznypJLEnTdvMa2+i5Nae=t9vTA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.147]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrKLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+JvjW5k0q5gg71PdSxWvD7HbjF9n43F 2n/t7A7MHuca3rN7LFnyk8lj8uM25gDmKC6blNSczLLUIn27BK6My1+fshd8Z6t4/24BawPj JtYuRk4OCQETiXkbfzND2GISF+6tZ+ti5OIQEjjKKDHjwWImkISQwEJGiQ0rqrsYOTjYBCwk uv9pg4RFBCIljnQdB+tlFlCXuLP4HDuILQw089jtDWwQNaYScx98YoKwkyQ2/+gH28sioCIx eXkzmM0r4Ctxd2MfM8Te/SwSPya+BEtwCgRKfL97gwXEZgQ67vupNUwQy8Qlbj2ZzwRxtIDE kj3noR4QlXj5+B8ryJ0SAkoS07amQZTrSdyYOoUNwtaWWLbwNTPEXkGJkzOfsExgFJuFZOos JC2zkLTMQtKygJFlFaNocWpxUm66kZFealFmcnFxfp5eXmrJJkZgPB3c8ttgB+PL546HGAU4 GJV4eB8c2xksxJpYVlyZe4hRmoNFSZx34bl5wUIC6YklqdmpqQWpRfFFpTmpxYcYmTg4pRoY F/KxCc5uWtl5L3N/7j2P6Xc3fWXpcrgXq5n1SPf3R517hZ4RZ8pWHGP79+E6vyHrpJ5L73RO fbT5/Z3hzb9v29x9D4QwVBop1PikfQ7nnMzfyvRTX3ja0/duO2OPmkzfsUegoDXq6gNhXX3L 0kn9+pkJq5gd0zZd8wiWN1as9BJ6+XJ/wnVeJZbijERDLeai4kQA1SORgogCAAA=
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/iPzwhb4hYBW-QtZI23kD363C2ak
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Question about ICE-Lite server
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 09:03:25 -0000

Hi,

>>> I'm hope not. Implementing ICE-Lite in a server is trivial.
>>> Implementing full ICE is an overhead in a server. Please not. It is
>>> Firefox which must adhere to the standard and use regular nomination
>>> when the peer is ICE-Lite.
>>
>>
>> Well, we're currently discussing what the standards should say.
>> If we decide that counterparties to WebRTC do full ICE (just like
>> we've required them to do a bunch of other stuff) then it will be
>> the other side which needs to adjust.
>
>
> Of course. I just hope such a decision is not taken given the amount
> of server side implementations relying on ICE-Lite (and the fact that
> it is not so hard for full ICE clients to behave correctly when
> talking to a lite peer).

+1.

I also we more or less had agreed on this in the past, that ICE-Lite is ok e.g. for gateways.

Regards,

Christer

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email