IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Question about ICE-Lite server

Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> Fri, 11 July 2014 18:43 UTC

Return-Path: <juberti@google.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA3F81B2935 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 11:43:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.029
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.029 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uyhVkft1vAmo for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 11:43:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vc0-x22d.google.com (mail-vc0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 220561B2938 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 11:43:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vc0-f173.google.com with SMTP id lf12so2839280vcb.4 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 11:43:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=ce2qAa6YJ2MkDQHE/FI29Knwc+Vcwo8tc3JEcaNQVkY=; b=aO/hNTzkPleemAHdAAz0vnIxLlSV+7mOj9QjmgKbbtyQ+uh5tXAepD084uk/1WGZvH 7ocrqreUJUvxg9VauCbLSwbPDXqkgvoL97io0U1abafw4yLcrDWuBAsCMAn5rvPN8Q10 ZGG3vWpXCliyEfAsZ30UCp6PDLBetwphNVMNKZGLkrWN/gU5qscnHIyzmLBFA0tHWfCr g+LSH8IxeRWd8f4Q/YQrG4e2MNZwx0sWq3Gk2T0z5DrUW1CJWNQyeNYEAXBNtpezqug9 JajRo5bwzPzKzvmp0e8/pPROpubBXcdxL1EHxHb4uuo/rwddoBSVY8HI60dv330tlcDO WHDQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=ce2qAa6YJ2MkDQHE/FI29Knwc+Vcwo8tc3JEcaNQVkY=; b=hg9SlImLAFjZNEegzdmAsfYvoj4GeTLGrCSFAaVzbZftwFjFyccK3MWemHKWrArly4 GyJVSc6NxxTisFFa5ySCH7C/0InqE4/PtFA7J/v/z/b9SDbWOssrW8sQ3vfDOrfpIA18 /ho44LdRgzUx4zU/iXh6PynXQSGCrb2vb7f/29c60+Gjc7fZre+lTARww0gLjRf6ARQf eOUuY7yGg3hOnTH1Kp5CKLYi8aL/N4FD05/MLJDXz8ssOU0u3X9xNc1O48DARRRJPjtC fcCD/aVlfjw/kD09G0VsP5HcRUDlTojvL0yMhSid+7q+rvxSRx06wb0Ho+A2umg8n3C5 BanQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQll0hoU90QsHwh7WXRRrU3X3L50pNhSCDJ9Bkkg6F2IcpS6oTzYvU0vEfqvTAdnHCDsl1Lp
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.189.161 with SMTP id gj1mr732200vdc.2.1405104215186; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 11:43:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.27.8 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 11:43:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.27.8 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 11:43:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAD5OKxsQpfzyNrYiTfYJHk-D+ZQwC3TmHNVxXhuLNQQyCdYJmw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALiegf=kLtiUKoue=ahXP4fUhLJNNd8vCaQTECQxjK5R7cjLTQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxv8s5-FNR-kq0C01H_Ev39cyBs5P__Pd-0cmCXDFYy-YQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBPV_iVcSmi+ndDaYY6zX=F7TRoSDFqe5hzJP3-NjZ7Y1w@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegf=CMAOwVF3=gNY9qrsTfsEwuiwvGZ_1SaS0waOUE83-Ug@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBMPyT4y1v12O5pb7Khs2ge0pgjUugrBS0NoK8=SLOScxQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-3fWP0q2O58FirSYcV3Ldai4TcRoBQg7nDx4OTPc_evrA@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfke27BGRQc-HhZnQRHZWJfPzYjGf+spSdn_yh-Wb87NjA@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-21TXrhV7mPpt2rzm6oQOCifNOphm8FqFo2-t+Nis497Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxsQpfzyNrYiTfYJHk-D+ZQwC3TmHNVxXhuLNQQyCdYJmw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 11:43:35 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOJ7v-3pFtKJPggXDXcDTjGH12b-61NnhdBTLvwpoV2b=RiOVw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
To: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1133f7389e811c04fdef51a4"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/K4dR3BQ6IOnwMrekYieQusBeIzw
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Question about ICE-Lite server
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 18:43:39 -0000

Chrome doesn't do that. I think that behavior is harmful and is going to be
changed in ice-bis.
On Jul 11, 2014 1:26 PM, "Roman Shpount" <roman@telurix.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Yes, Chrome always uses aggressive nomination unless ICE Lite is used.
>>
>>
> What about the cases when it sees unknown "ice-options" attribute? This
> should make Chrome use regular nomination as well.
> _____________
> Roman Shpount
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email