IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [saag] SSH & Ntruprime

Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com> Thu, 11 April 2024 02:07 UTC

Return-Path: <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDA93C14F600 for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 19:07:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8a6MPeywgjya for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 19:07:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42e.google.com (mail-wr1-x42e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A240FC14F5F4 for <saag@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 19:07:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42e.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-34388753650so3118766f8f.3 for <saag@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 19:07:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1712801237; x=1713406037; darn=ietf.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=50QAsoNNjRQvmvJdCJQRQlTFbd7BzZclESsyH6yW/Hc=; b=FJLS8iF1wL7erKMH3rI2VrP7c1aFswHxs68Z0F4FwpiU2zIxYGSLCRqeHJTP5RGQ2c StG9Ne1lcZVJTcEfiwj26ygRRNZEFYu6SMvb7M8feW5SUU2meDtVwBnI/dttHWg66bAi KyRRxkLZmKt9Gjy5dOUIl0egr0+CqjWwEIuJIaF20iUA1eNnUrEG1qZ4CGQDIrcXTsNy ZcdY/KHzQldjSQfea3C3199HfvMAEcfUN7T6Z49o3laAdy5QaBCbyMFkyGJeHM21R1LK eiNQMfPwL5PtW0hXWoiwfyxSjikhxKVYrG0pq3UoaEwPL2XQqwKJGOi1U0GJyTH9Ao4i StXQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1712801237; x=1713406037; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=50QAsoNNjRQvmvJdCJQRQlTFbd7BzZclESsyH6yW/Hc=; b=S7CurRf73ncNsUZhM/QRKYI5xT+5o+zvLZfmeoBVkOPC71qer7RMlO83KrJ36yuklQ voytkGtDCGacuqk/qfJrdJEaDw+cOEbKdwPT2eXn945UyTejNz8+jQdrb6Sd6FObx0Uk NeHfrEi0NZVUwsltR4qIIOub3CJQXXOpcmxLeHjNzq76iUQ4XvDqCpR7dUTHWnzPuCux Bdz+mIwatM6ZkFkykXC9hnLCsrZSzjtJnHb0rRquo+iH3DFajDTl/jC5trvQyRMn6yEg HIA2Bo4RoZtWE+wqmu+IY88EdQoLvCt3uyL33L3uMUnLD17DEfS+TiqAAiP9PSD861tD MM+g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyAUdyOn4Thvam5jcOr4T2fhNFkyv2wR7sFKVoOJpRNay9Zvi8S dHVdJQrjefpEuSqHRWCN9brjhHId0nLM2msL2Iyv2hnnCBWWL5NS3pN6o4sNXmtX5jJmgzC1MQ2 +wbDnW+MJI4HAiIKWmWflcUOuJUw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGhPM3061a8Dgeg8E2RrFiDmrvbrgsUPD78JNhZUn4L8oTl5fkafybC0plgUmLYyynq+dJxDCPPQtjriQCMKO4=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:47c1:0:b0:341:b9dc:eb03 with SMTP id o1-20020a5d47c1000000b00341b9dceb03mr4143893wrc.3.1712801237236; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 19:07:17 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <05D73B77-ECFB-43E9-A2A8-00D46F63FC32@aiven.io> <20240405162821.1801419.qmail@cr.yp.to> <CAGL5yWaJXRDyiQ=w2XJcoFhCQ3JDriqO+jAcOKz7J4kW2PY=uw@mail.gmail.com> <87o7ahzi8c.fsf@kaka.sjd.se> <CABcZeBO-_k3pTsLAqOm3c5F8Cnbnd1mtdpuaoQicoCRBLPZLLg@mail.gmail.com> <d2bd2378-4de4-4426-b2f4-fbcff6de5d2a@cs.tcd.ie> <CABcZeBPtRoGg=diFd2MjRXn0SD+KMJSC65ROe55SpsdcLL_m_g@mail.gmail.com> <9da5e8a6-b329-41cd-89c1-4423f6739341@nthpermutation.com> <CABcZeBN-Oy-vG=VYwqAmd=Fi7AWyp1pQPnMQMhe0-EzOPZwrsQ@mail.gmail.com> <7127f31a-bb6f-467a-aa67-55b46e7f95f2@nthpermutation.com> <3bef7fff-6a84-42ba-a2ee-a5e6bd60c816@cs.tcd.ie> <CANeU+ZDvWWd+HmtXx=4x0zgO6FNfeqwzybU+jjVHzFWqkgz2Rg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANeU+ZDvWWd+HmtXx=4x0zgO6FNfeqwzybU+jjVHzFWqkgz2Rg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 19:07:05 -0700
Message-ID: <CACsn0ckmW9oSvUarqRYDVLJS6K-6_c2j7UhYTM6TpdYjr_GrQA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "StJohns, Michael" <msj@nthpermutation.com>
Cc: Security Area Advisory Group <saag@ietf.org>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/0oKlR4427bfewYw9C4cs2kTtPk8>
Subject: Re: [saag] SSH & Ntruprime
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/saag/>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 02:07:21 -0000

On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 7:05 PM StJohns, Michael <msj@nthpermutation.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 21:06 Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hiya,
>>
>> On 10/04/2024 19:41, Michael StJohns wrote:
>> >>
>> >
>> > Yeah - 8447 was an effective example of a submarine submission.
>>
>> I don't think that's at all accurate. TLS is one or our
>> currently very important protocols so nothing coming from
>> that WG could reasonably be described as taking a submarine
>> approach IMO.
>
>
>
> I’m going to stick with the word as, intentional or not, it’s sort of what the record shows.
>
> According to the datracker, you were the document shepherd, but the shepherd report that Sean added to the tracker was done against the -03 draft (note the date of the report vs the post date of -04).  The -04 draft was where the notes were added.  None of the text in either the shepherd report nor the last call announcement text mentioned that  IDs were now acceptable for Specification Required references.

Why do you think that this applies to anything other than the
registries specifically named in the RFC?
Sincerely,
Watson

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email