Re: [saag] SSH & Ntruprime

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Wed, 10 April 2024 16:07 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFC13C14F68C for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 09:07:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FJWef_I0wf8L for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 09:07:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oo1-xc29.google.com (mail-oo1-xc29.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c29]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40956C14F5FA for <saag@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 09:07:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oo1-xc29.google.com with SMTP id 006d021491bc7-5aa3f0fcd46so1993666eaf.1 for <saag@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 09:07:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1712765260; x=1713370060; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=kinjMEoOqC+PB3n13HZspmNWqselG79PRBLsvos+Kbc=; b=EM/+ToVUuiU+YN4X9uU+vlTSt6A2FDadRaUrWH6kKmD/2Uev2ipKOvdMTduCg7h4CD nDexdYO/8/bWemgfATHqWrngW0jp+ug1XDa3CjcOez7x0klVtlUXWEWTEThkxXNSLrbD beXCLI7i5FfFPimfQKjIJrCpni7KHMryaKzJOY5mtDmNofwJSnqlcAhD8VbBqsUnSvaH 4Hq4wRVHEMyCsRvuPlTe2OiKh6i813E0l1C5cjmguR4yyWo2Ft0G4NbpDkBZiABxDWO+ w+xGRF220Edykbsxm4iOSjq7r82ZbBrf237UwzHkAFRAIMPsIF41Z8jiBIFHH0LMTAnj 9TKA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1712765260; x=1713370060; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=kinjMEoOqC+PB3n13HZspmNWqselG79PRBLsvos+Kbc=; b=t0u2Q8rhT1jA1xweG5nXdeTYXAZuMZSIbvpBQ4IcpcboX9a/UjUZWSwmkr1NrTsU8J sCh5Jj3kE4BO2sp1fZiFwVh9PQQ0KR3Yl3cRgA+bvur/8/FqQ5yTyJldIgk2o71tYh1g aHD1VLSvwTC2JqOTA7eryYrw2O6XrJBjPMEJCh/RzmTYeJASguM08uallymjN8ciqkDf RgPqmGjqb551L+9MJ06Vde+qpV7M8zX6cRR/QeP7MivLxq9SXnqyCYs3FKcQUUoY9F43 9Rnn2XBhZ8oSG8V5wMdl6lrTICRFGzvjUMP3Z9rzO6QuaHXDn6/DHyeYVV0nIDBXjt4k FbqA==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCV0e57BVYXZfZi57RgxR2rF7tS5HWx4S+/s4AhuWKW04hpwyyr1sBCr5AHIUieSXWnaMGs/97HSuaUa9wE4
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx64XqyMxWjbNnThVuzW63sz27z6VJ89Kw79mIq37NDavLon2bh bk1RLbsvHLprQHGWN2ajVQTRoqP680yjJRKQDjEUR6btBtZEVeIbZUhfIvNPocr1FfrEV4Z6gPH Spi7dEGM8UK+zUnlSjuARKcEXj0nOgmoaz2dvti/TFu0+Uni3
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGz3INt8we4lECB3Z33wBi3cIHTUfMvV1eC26JI5aCnPYTSDkwGiT4z5bkydEREZw+GoDlJDemD6exHb46JE14=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6359:5f04:b0:17f:2811:921c with SMTP id lf4-20020a0563595f0400b0017f2811921cmr3356196rwc.27.1712765260221; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 09:07:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <05D73B77-ECFB-43E9-A2A8-00D46F63FC32@aiven.io> <20240405162821.1801419.qmail@cr.yp.to> <CAGL5yWaJXRDyiQ=w2XJcoFhCQ3JDriqO+jAcOKz7J4kW2PY=uw@mail.gmail.com> <87o7ahzi8c.fsf@kaka.sjd.se> <CABcZeBO-_k3pTsLAqOm3c5F8Cnbnd1mtdpuaoQicoCRBLPZLLg@mail.gmail.com> <d2bd2378-4de4-4426-b2f4-fbcff6de5d2a@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <d2bd2378-4de4-4426-b2f4-fbcff6de5d2a@cs.tcd.ie>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 09:07:04 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBPtRoGg=diFd2MjRXn0SD+KMJSC65ROe55SpsdcLL_m_g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Cc: Simon Josefsson <simon=40josefsson.org@dmarc.ietf.org>, Paul Wouters <paul.wouters=40aiven.io@dmarc.ietf.org>, saag@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000eb71480615c03c5c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/UkdcMBXtfhjO9zhdFFYeILSHHvM>
Subject: Re: [saag] SSH & Ntruprime
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/saag/>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 16:07:45 -0000

On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 8:09 AM Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
wrote:

>
> Hiya,
>
> On 10/04/2024 14:36, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> > I think perhaps this is the source of our difference of opinion; the
> IETF's
> > job is not to*document*  protocols but to develop and standardize them.
>
> That may well capture the reason for different opinions,
> but, in this case, SSH is an important Internet protocol
> that has previously been documented in RFCs and that has
> had an IETF WG, so I think we'd be pretty unwise to push
> away people who'd like to document changes to that protocol,
> esp when the whole pq thing is in such flux.
>

I'm not proposing to push them away. I'm saying that that documentation
does not require an RFC but rather that an ID is fine.

-Ekr


>
> S.
>