Re: [saag] SSH & Ntruprime

[Stephen Farrell <[e-mail]>]

Hiya,

On 10/04/2024 17:07, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> I'm not proposing to push them away. 

I'd be pleasantly, but extremely, surprised if this
thread were perceived as a constructive welcoming
way to help the draft authors do what they wanted to
get done;-)

> I'm saying that that documentation
> does not require an RFC but rather that an ID is fine.

Yeah, but that's not what they want, nor what's been
done before for SSH, so just because it's possible
does not mean that possibility is the right approach.

Also, addressing a point you made elsewhere - FWIW I
do think community cycles spent on reviewing SSH are
well worthwhile, both for the SSH folks and for the
people doing the reviewing, and for the rest of us
who pretty much all use SSH. (That kind of activity
seems much more productive to me than trying to push
people to adopt today's fashion in IANA code point
allocation schemes.)

Cheers,
S.