IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Sidrops] WGLC - draft-ietf-sidrops-validating-bgp-speaker - ENDS 09/07/2018 - Sept 7th 2018

Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> Tue, 29 October 2019 00:05 UTC

Return-Path: <nick@foobar.org>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C00CA1200C7 for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 17:05:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mHzZghG1JXWK for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 17:05:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.netability.ie (mail.netability.ie [IPv6:2a03:8900:0:100::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C5671200B8 for <sidrops@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 17:05:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Envelope-To: sidrops@ietf.org
Received: from crumpet.foobar.org (089-101-070074.ntlworld.ie [89.101.70.74] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.netability.ie (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x9T05NSi082409 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 29 Oct 2019 00:05:23 GMT (envelope-from nick@foobar.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: cheesecake.ibn.ie: Host 089-101-070074.ntlworld.ie [89.101.70.74] (may be forged) claimed to be crumpet.foobar.org
To: Christopher Morrow <christopher.morrow@gmail.com>
Cc: SIDR Operations WG <sidrops@ietf.org>
References: <CAL9jLaYqGt1+f3GaccNwjPOHxM34ifWDu5bhRx24PMYHpqV4XQ@mail.gmail.com> <20180822161549.GA1021@hanna.meerval.net> <42CA116C-4F74-4D31-A58E-3D7528FC529F@de-cix.net> <CAL9jLaaYzZmGVgEPfuDze5D_yN5x_CMKFEnY7XwM2F7EycwEOQ@mail.gmail.com> <m2y3cgo4ta.wl-randy@psg.com> <20180905073454.GU3097@hanna.meerval.net> <16AB499B-D859-48D2-9C36-AAF4C6F29B1C@de-cix.net> <20180906134026.GC3097@hanna.meerval.net> <F812E3F2-8882-410F-82A2-942BA3B3096C@de-cix.net> <CAL9jLaZrVYDyUEWVqn992wxGMurGsjrmDeu-jjR6Rp6smCv+1g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Message-ID: <cfa203ad-03fd-f2da-b356-4cadeb24d998@foobar.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 00:05:22 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 PostboxApp/7.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAL9jLaZrVYDyUEWVqn992wxGMurGsjrmDeu-jjR6Rp6smCv+1g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/RPdDXb4JlxrYPWTHNR0wl3tEETU>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] WGLC - draft-ietf-sidrops-validating-bgp-speaker - ENDS 09/07/2018 - Sept 7th 2018
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 00:05:27 -0000

Christopher Morrow wrote on 28/10/2019 17:11:
> This WGLC ... has dragged on very much too long :(
> 
> I think there's not consensus to move this forward at this time.
> I think I should have said this ~8 months ago, but was hopeful that
> either we might reach consensus OR the draft would be move to match
> expectations of the working group.
> 
> At this point, I think a clear signal from the WG would help the
> authors change their draft OR abandon it.

the ideas behind the draft have fundamental problems which don't appear 
to be resolveable.

Separate to this, since the last proper discussion about this draft in 
early 2018, proper RPKI has begun to take off in a serious way, so I 
would question whether the long term justification for progressing the 
draft is there.

Nick

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email