Re: [Sipping] draft-camarillo-sipping-sbc-funcs-02.txt

Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com> Sat, 29 October 2005 18:46 UTC

Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EVvix-0006P9-Qr; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 14:46:39 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EVvir-0006K6-LS for sipping@megatron.ietf.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 14:46:37 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA17318 for <sipping@ietf.org>; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 14:46:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailgw4.ericsson.se ([193.180.251.62]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EVvwb-0003Mb-PS for sipping@ietf.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 15:00:51 -0400
Received: from esealmw128.eemea.ericsson.se (unknown [153.88.254.121]) by mailgw4.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 009BD4F5; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 20:46:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from esealmw128.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.254.176]) by esealmw128.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Sat, 29 Oct 2005 20:46:24 +0200
Received: from mail.lmf.ericsson.se ([131.160.11.50]) by esealmw128.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Sat, 29 Oct 2005 20:46:24 +0200
Received: from [131.160.126.79] (rvi2-126-79.lmf.ericsson.se [131.160.126.79]) by mail.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EDCD235F; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 21:46:24 +0300 (EEST)
Message-ID: <4363C37E.5040102@ericsson.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 21:46:22 +0300
From: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Medhavi Bhatia <mbhatia@nextone.com>
Subject: Re: [Sipping] draft-camarillo-sipping-sbc-funcs-02.txt
References: <200510211734.NAA02932@dreadnought.cnchost.com>
In-Reply-To: <200510211734.NAA02932@dreadnought.cnchost.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Oct 2005 18:46:24.0626 (UTC) FILETIME=[100CC520:01C5DCB9]
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 1ac7cc0a4cd376402b85bc1961a86ac2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: 'sipping' <sipping@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: sipping@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "SIPPING Working Group \(applications of SIP\)" <sipping.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping>, <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:sipping@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping>, <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: sipping-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: sipping-bounces@ietf.org

Hi,

 > It should definitely not
> make a case that the analysis needs to be done only for SBCs (which is why I
> think it needs a focus change).

if you read the lattest version of the draft, you will see that it 
focuses on *functions* that break SIP somehow. Those functions may, or 
may not, be performed by an SBC. The draft is not intended to be SBC 
specific.

Cheers,

Gonzalo

_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sip@ietf.org for new developments of core SIP