Re: [Softwires] I-D Action: draft-ietf-softwire-stateless-4v6-motivation-02.txt

liu dapeng <maxpassion@gmail.com> Tue, 12 June 2012 09:49 UTC

Return-Path: <maxpassion@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39A8421F85DF for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 02:49:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.445
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.445 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.154, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eu1xh9AH7LCo for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 02:49:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com (mail-ob0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6519F21F85CD for <softwires@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 02:49:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by obbeh20 with SMTP id eh20so11141940obb.31 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 02:49:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gQHkqaCy/ij/q51nb/xnSgHYV0R+koWCP8MWwxFh85Y=; b=XacyGXZ0uC/5p5Tsk5ggmXOmWMnaHFqKWgrODcatdHGLII0KJlfbR3BLF24fDeAqLs lqPQRxVZDvGFdnsEzj1ACvBvM29LKFoWG7CDnUkYP5//mXNmhjIaIJrz5G8l4iB0x9CE RQGa7wNvYyQjyN1Gq5KsghraV8jyfRskSR8PPvIA57qYfzfmFJjaWZSnOkiZox4fSMXB fGnZPWkWXgDZiGrDFP0FZ5aIws2Svwh6L26zl/T5wEWDXlWoLZhIxR1Vi3QhV86uCE40 GMb8jxldd2zkH2hdIzuLa/T9MyW9qPQHHN1Ajx7Ja1wudDJ5zKJnPjWUb0wnH4CnsYXw IGeA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.60.28.162 with SMTP id c2mr19745953oeh.3.1339494556747; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 02:49:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.76.1.46 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 02:49:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36E331FED48@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
References: <20120612054306.29642.66811.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36E331FEC8A@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <CAKcc6Acib3e84un2s_AB7wEyiudRYgyCEJKb3oKh_3BWLFCz6g@mail.gmail.com> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36E331FED48@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 17:49:16 +0800
Message-ID: <CAKcc6AdUsxUSjX9kmNnRKyRhj1tN6Hq-2fBLcdzkEO2xp3T87w@mail.gmail.com>
From: liu dapeng <maxpassion@gmail.com>
To: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "softwires@ietf.org" <softwires@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] I-D Action: draft-ietf-softwire-stateless-4v6-motivation-02.txt
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 09:49:18 -0000

 Ok, then we can make this more clear in our document.

"States still should be maintained in other equipments, e.g. customer
premises equipment or host, in order to restrict IP address or port number
information into the configured context except that a non-shared IPv4 address is
assigned to a standalone host."


Best Regards,
Dapeng Liu

2012/6/12, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>:
> Hi Dapeng,
>
> I can't add the port restriction because stateless IPv4/IPv6 solutions
> (e.g., MAP, 4RD) support also the ability to assign a full IP address.
>
> Cheers,
> Med
>
>>-----Message d'origine-----
>>De : liu dapeng [mailto:maxpassion@gmail.com]
>>Envoyé : mardi 12 juin 2012 09:14
>>À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed OLNC/NAD/TIP
>>Cc : softwires@ietf.org
>>Objet : Re: [Softwires] I-D Action:
>>draft-ietf-softwire-stateless-4v6-motivation-02.txt
>>
>>Hi Med,
>>
>>Thanks for posting this new version but I guess it doesn't reflect all
>>the discussion we had. I suggest to make following modifications.
>>
>>"States still should be maintained in other equipments, e.g.  customer
>>premises equipment or host, in order to restrict port numbers within a
>>dedicated range."
>>
>>Please be undestood all the efforts are for precise expression
>>for the readers.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>Best Regards,
>>Dapeng Liu
>>
>>2012/6/12, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>:
>>> Dear WG members,
>>>
>>> The new version includes the comments received during the WG LC (from
>>> Dapeng).
>>>
>>> A diff is available here:
>>>
>>>
>>http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-softwire-stateles
> s-4v6-motivation-02
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Med
>>>
>>>
>>>>-----Message d'origine-----
>>>>De : softwires-bounces@ietf.org
>>>>[mailto:softwires-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de
>>>>internet-drafts@ietf.org
>>>>Envoyé : mardi 12 juin 2012 07:43
>>>>À : i-d-announce@ietf.org
>>>>Cc : softwires@ietf.org
>>>>Objet : [Softwires] I-D Action:
>>>>draft-ietf-softwire-stateless-4v6-motivation-02.txt
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line
>>>>Internet-Drafts directories.
>>>> This draft is a work item of the Softwires Working Group of
>>the IETF.
>>>>
>>>>	Title           : Motivations for Carrier-side
>>>>Stateless IPv4 over IPv6 Migration Solutions
>>>>	Author(s)       : Mohamed Boucadair
>>>>                          Satoru Matsushima
>>>>                          Yiu Lee
>>>>                          Olaf Bonness
>>>>                          Isabel Borges
>>>>                          Gang Chen
>>>>	Filename        :
>>>>draft-ietf-softwire-stateless-4v6-motivation-02.txt
>>>>	Pages           : 16
>>>>	Date            : 2012-06-11
>>>>
>>>>Abstract:
>>>>   IPv4 service continuity is one of the most pressing problems that
>>>>   must be resolved by Service Providers during the IPv6 transition
>>>>   period - especially after the exhaustion of the public
>>IPv4 address
>>>>   space.  Current standardization effort that addresses IPv4 service
>>>>   continuity focuses on stateful mechanisms.  This document
>>elaborates
>>>>   on the motivations for the need to undertake a companion effort to
>>>>   specify stateless IPv4 over IPv6 approaches.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>>>>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-softwire-stateless-
>>>>4v6-motivation
>>>>
>>>>There's also a htmlized version available at:
>>>>http://tools.ietf.org/html/submission.filename }}-02
>>>>
>>>>A diff from previous version is available at:
>>>>http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-softwire-stateles
>>>>s-4v6-motivation-02
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>>>>ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>Softwires mailing list
>>>>Softwires@ietf.org
>>>>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Softwires mailing list
>>> Softwires@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
>>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>
>>------
>>Best Regards,
>>Dapeng Liu
>>


-- 

------
Best Regards,
Dapeng Liu