IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Softwires] I-D Action: draft-ietf-softwire-stateless-4v6-motivation-02.txt

"Lee, Yiu" <Yiu_Lee@Cable.Comcast.com> Wed, 13 June 2012 19:50 UTC

Return-Path: <yiu_lee@cable.comcast.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6773D21F85B8 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 12:50:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.364
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.364 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.867, BAYES_00=-2.599, HOST_EQ_MODEMCABLE=1.368, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YT41BVq0f3cU for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 12:50:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cable.comcast.com (copdcavout01.cable.comcast.com [76.96.32.253]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFEC621F85B1 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 12:50:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ([24.40.56.115]) by copdcavout01.cable.comcast.com with ESMTP id C7WM3M1.21124725; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 13:34:05 -0600
Received: from PACDCEXMB05.cable.comcast.com ([169.254.7.88]) by PACDCEXHUB02.cable.comcast.com ([fe80::492e:3fa1:c2ad:e04e%13]) with mapi id 14.02.0283.003; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 15:50:35 -0400
From: "Lee, Yiu" <Yiu_Lee@Cable.Comcast.com>
To: liu dapeng <maxpassion@gmail.com>, "mohamed.boucadair@orange.com" <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
Thread-Topic: [Softwires] I-D Action: draft-ietf-softwire-stateless-4v6-motivation-02.txt
Thread-Index: AQHNSZ3Ld97getMBoEibP8aAqkYxhw==
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 19:50:34 +0000
Message-ID: <CBFE671C.21F86%yiu_lee@cable.comcast.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKcc6Ae1zRwAfmt7kB6ia69CgpRxxQJTKohAf7+ueNrTeQAu3w@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.2.120421
x-originating-ip: [24.40.55.72]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="B_3422447433_1446146"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "softwires@ietf.org" <softwires@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] I-D Action: draft-ietf-softwire-stateless-4v6-motivation-02.txt
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 19:50:44 -0000

I prefer Tom suggestion. It is typical to have a NAT but not a must or
should.

On 6/13/12 12:38 PM, "liu dapeng" <maxpassion@gmail.com> wrote:

>I can change "may" to "should" to
>>please you but it really does make sense.
>
>=> thanks
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email