IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] Draft LAMPS Recharter

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Wed, 09 May 2018 19:09 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 998411274D2 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 May 2018 12:09:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Fg6oXFOGZSJ6 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 May 2018 12:09:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C68012778E for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 May 2018 12:09:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BAF0300A03 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 May 2018 15:09:12 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id WyMFgYm-Y6TL for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 May 2018 15:09:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [5.5.33.75] (vpn.snozzages.com [204.42.252.17]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4858B3005AE for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 May 2018 15:09:11 -0400 (EDT)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Wed, 09 May 2018 15:09:10 -0400
References: <1D329233-AFCE-421B-81FE-EDDC30386260@vigilsec.com> <94C70910-6BA3-4364-BE43-3316AE1E51C6@vigilsec.com> <CAErg=HF40T1CLuu=5GebtsvFMphtSRyK+O5TpTn0pTz1v9jMgQ@mail.gmail.com> <64CD1067-8639-4C2C-A8EC-ED5FBC14F633@gmail.com> <CAErg=HHXj4tVoQ06Z_ZNJKnCF9efd64DOx5Hf_sLaqATX6+OWQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+LwhkugUvtd_rmbXYDXCzBhKD=fc7gbxpWeSzzasmGFDFZw@mail.gmail.com> <CAErg=HF89sRyUrYcqcG=_onnW_NnsyNN2CKWQ8ty=Xb_v8nOkw@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+LwjSTBfV32NT66_vA=EX4OPnx5qxYjbHG92NVzJpCwq8nw@mail.gmail.com> <CAErg=HFaS1g-S2zu04sCXZ_58OUPJ26Tg0RzS1V4UkTWejfO9Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: LAMPS <spasm@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAErg=HFaS1g-S2zu04sCXZ_58OUPJ26Tg0RzS1V4UkTWejfO9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-Id: <B3943C41-9B6D-4979-8B8B-C7477C8863C6@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/0XtfWTxmsJDnYs86enCF6sYqWuA>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Draft LAMPS Recharter
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2018 19:09:16 -0000

Based on the I-D that Wei recently posted, do people think we should add a work item:

7. Specify new extended key usage identifiers when there is a
significant constituency that will make use of certificates that
include that new identifier.

Russ

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email