IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] Request to close the LC and move forward//RE: WGLC - draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Thu, 27 February 2020 13:08 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BF4E3A07B5 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 05:08:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0HOEhib8_vrw for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 05:08:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82f.google.com (mail-qt1-x82f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CB053A07AE for <spring@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 05:08:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82f.google.com with SMTP id d9so2148155qte.12 for <spring@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 05:08:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=UvNbUWTz51edZ+o2Q+K6j62njGquuHjb6vjFr1BgjWc=; b=ftxpRze9Hd5w9aK3AwtMajfzqvWznFaEcHvFqnbg0cEAJOhJXJYQ5A6NvZDiIcRTRw EJNIWmxCv0M2uTOVAmtCMJoDlwtuAkxz/Kyun6eoHE6jP0OcQ9YdxgDVIMRaQ9eImd3Y jgW4tO7VbeTFtBKP7MprUdxbN7H1BfMoAOZVTzrkLzUMYX6SoD5bB/gD8pH08HEFy4tY rEVhqDRdhT5+RWT6MYYq3FmIUYw3eASj5Qvm32CLMr8a+ZNhYUuoPMxqrUp1Gy79AS29 2/GqSjviaRbfqw+RUyH/nr2NJiA5jz2tkX8+1cCejTkp0jEC0OzjZ/2TCdV08zZ5teXk ZL5w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=UvNbUWTz51edZ+o2Q+K6j62njGquuHjb6vjFr1BgjWc=; b=fDBzXfNAe3PDVS/eZUG1FSU1AvY6AnSPxYZzLsWE1snVK1bUTq1e4cNG5tK70o7B/c A9EnCbuwgOEkRzK0mIWEdP/7vBggHHESYrWwKTrjANUWuc2LOTWwLS35zRWoyUgYox6Z 5wKrArKFAC3aXabU2UR7UMpxaKLnOKwf8D6Ma8tjwVFZLWMwEpXtQ6k/i1IO1nNK4wdz DL6SrhBSnEdeh16BBviihoC+OwcBcFx5vZcpyaJdFGcUpjJ4QujZhf+vsrxzB6A6ISyd YUewXQt1qvkz98XISdVIYSFpqeeusIRAQLIG5vlsRJTrjNNw3InbWCRa2UIJsoSHLaFd qSew==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVPfq+cunU37juqAjViqogfCN0T9fD9heY+fuBFmDipCl9FCaXT +IYR3/qFZcv6VlLQB2ucrlEI2g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzpBeBSn0RYDH/x1P4r3pKHDmHBUtfMVxwaZ/RGz8p9h2AGqgkoXa4CGoWOZ4gbtgr5eYGhaQ==
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:3ac6:: with SMTP id x64mr5080662qte.56.1582808929198; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 05:08:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:18b:300:36ee:b8ed:c35:a977:7427? ([2601:18b:300:36ee:b8ed:c35:a977:7427]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o7sm3064274qkd.119.2020.02.27.05.08.48 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 27 Feb 2020 05:08:48 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.13.2.1\))
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
In-Reply-To: <C69945CF-0ED0-4CCB-96F6-03DA533A41B6@bell.ca>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 08:08:46 -0500
Cc: "Maojianwei (Mao)" <maojianwei@huawei.com>, Lizhenbin <lizhenbin@huawei.com>, "bruno.decraene@orange.com" <bruno.decraene@orange.com>, SPRING WG List <spring@ietf.org>, "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming <draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <66327512-43CE-47CB-A5BD-10E5D8F71FD8@fugue.com>
References: <6B803B308679F94FBD953ABEA5CCCCD701089509@dggema524-mbx.china.huawei.com> <6E7A3022-DEC7-4E35-9A56-0F708CD41180@fugue.com> <C69945CF-0ED0-4CCB-96F6-03DA533A41B6@bell.ca>
To: "Voyer, Daniel" <daniel.voyer@bell.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.13.2.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/8YmhRvozEpMryA7buNGHf-d780E>
Subject: Re: [spring] Request to close the LC and move forward//RE: WGLC - draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 13:08:51 -0000

On Feb 27, 2020, at 8:02 AM, Voyer, Daniel <daniel.voyer@bell.ca> wrote:
> You should rephrase that - 1 objection can’t prevent the rest of us to move forward hence why sometime we need to go with a rough consensus.

Rough consensus means all the objections have been addressed, not that everyone agrees.  The situation here is that all the objections appear not to have been addressed, and that agreed-upon supporting work has not been done (and nobody wants to do it).

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email