Re: [tcpm] SYN/ACK Payloads, draft 01

"Adam Langley" <agl@imperialviolet.org> Wed, 13 August 2008 21:40 UTC

Return-Path: <tcpm-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tcpm-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-tcpm-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFDDF3A68C7; Wed, 13 Aug 2008 14:40:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F15C23A6988 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Aug 2008 14:40:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.652
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.652 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.325, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2Sk7LvM0oJrJ for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Aug 2008 14:40:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.228]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E38113A693F for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Aug 2008 14:40:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so155277rvf.49 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Aug 2008 14:40:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=BtqHPyd1j4C8DxnamIdqmVxrDP+BiLoU2+bVqRAZ25c=; b=nmC1Xm+di66GclgvjkUBge7U0pBtdO+sScAyN6TI6jCEq0lF1oA1+O1J0LBXLwH7le Mozjd4v6InmQk20HBIaCX5yP7Avzi0GYe3W8c3h8a4cvVbFJ8K3LMj4nZNyxYemRy95k KhJ+YwPfpv4U+FVyv9mP1BiDv7VFRKCEh1Pps=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=ubwjCWg0EYBwCSK4N+mVKUjUa7q+fbnVFzWk71QJHBcv6RP84wMOQUnUY8zJuv3eFC p/93vgrSM7od+MeGtz2SUFJMdEMJE2XpzuZnnE8DsJct8CCMtFG8GL96V4NLt8hCaBFQ 7imjuCplMUs4mT+Aaen2VQkhlLgLCyqBzpf0s=
Received: by 10.140.157.1 with SMTP id f1mr233005rve.220.1218663602224; Wed, 13 Aug 2008 14:40:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.141.37.3 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Aug 2008 14:40:02 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <396556a20808131440j6b685405xc0fd78b83fb4857a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 14:40:02 -0700
From: "Adam Langley" <agl@imperialviolet.org>
To: "Eric Rescorla" <ekr@networkresonance.com>
In-Reply-To: <20080813203607.1605A50846@romeo.rtfm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <396556a20808111035s2b974233o1e9d3671e82e3350@mail.gmail.com> <20080813172752.AA7A650846@romeo.rtfm.com> <396556a20808131047q781675a3if23d727ef5ae918f@mail.gmail.com> <20080813181630.A1E6750848@romeo.rtfm.com> <396556a20808131145y1be0fb4saeb7bbf74d078268@mail.gmail.com> <20080813195027.C4C5B50848@romeo.rtfm.com> <396556a20808131307r65a9f6a0oe4365be029620b2c@mail.gmail.com> <20080813203607.1605A50846@romeo.rtfm.com>
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 26723e8bb1685e60
Cc: tcpm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [tcpm] SYN/ACK Payloads, draft 01
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org

On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Eric Rescorla <ekr@networkresonance.com> wrote:
> You're right, it does suck as an argument. And given that it's
> superficially implausible for the reasons you elided, I don't feel the
> need to entertain this as a serious design objective.

I certainly don't agree that it's superficially implausible. I shall
ask someone senior here if I can release some of our latency affect
data, although I doubt the answer will be positive.

Remeber that > 40% of US homes are still using dial-up[1] and that's
leveling out. Even if you are within the US, the RTT across the
country on a dial-up is 300-400ms[2].


[1] http://www.websiteoptimization.com/bw/0804/
[2] http://www.rohwer.org/Latency/Latency9.html

AGL

-- 
Adam Langley agl@imperialviolet.org http://www.imperialviolet.org
_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
tcpm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm