IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] Concluding WGLC for draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis-03

Yoshifumi Nishida <nsd.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 23 August 2021 08:43 UTC

Return-Path: <nsd.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E648B3A14E3; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 01:43:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CcToroZPFT0X; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 01:43:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf32.google.com (mail-qv1-xf32.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE73B3A14D1; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 01:43:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf32.google.com with SMTP id j9so9230762qvt.4; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 01:43:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=rb5bjDrM8Vi6dokDu7nIS6oNVETsPvL/kYTYF/oP4Sw=; b=Q4k1pdljsD1BwsLjWYzxxOVjxyUKSPkVyWdlJp4U+8XzYo8IZxmkBTqYnpUSQx4yoM x8LfPWhBTyQeprbJw6d++c3QYukXjosCBGFA6/2hwCbuWX/AX3WPeAIasr4kr2PqdLDn WePiHiFVDpLQCXs/pV4noCvRVdx88hIkUO7DcRSkYmHuag0v3BZrTjObbS7LK7QRh83B 9q4w+C6CzAqDZ5P4aJuIkS1VJqkBz6y0HJKgI/zksPWHr8ojJPKv+Sz4oq0xEAO/WepX t4baghPZG1wuNbX8OkdORTLqMSXJHQQlZLVvqcT/MmJr1f7QfDe3j+vEV6QJTUvKBPZx cH4g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=rb5bjDrM8Vi6dokDu7nIS6oNVETsPvL/kYTYF/oP4Sw=; b=e1Q/JQQVbnyPJZHzvAt8cL/3T5z5Zc4UKIxuAqDUlj9a7GcXE4KhiWqxezkz+HmMwT 418ToZuyKrfg2fHZ5j+Z2CEpVA1LDmL3IiBwF9mzYDy+1/xhBtp/FNJvQSc9+7T36HKY EmKAa5nZHf6bAuQR2xFXLysfN66Uf3CgD/1vsvubvhTVsA5sqKfTPlDO/cPncHzsl9hi Y36QUG/BG/4fPRzQXl0edDHeP8ywkOqsCo8I450HVaAcAYXYPIvMA3eOWgbInGyTy4P2 YWJACadNi/JreuVpQ1nny3kEnUBMAIP2LwmRmYoYOs+SCJTisOZ7RxC/H2hUtm2Vqmsx vdlg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532K7m0+PWoKmQ28gS+q2v8bG8ziJT3OT9tMBiLWeCKeuKieZ2SN HL0bUmueYmVCNHM4kC4a5X7dsXqvMmWN+wXcJ/X6FN6i+xc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwnVh1EavRA+6Ew7uVmV1Si4OZrnDavYt8Q+mloPjuZieTLFKOIq/SGk8Efr+1c97DdiE/qC0I42oWP03tL498=
X-Received: by 2002:ad4:4b61:: with SMTP id m1mr442260qvx.32.1629708230232; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 01:43:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAAK044SjMmBnO8xdn2ogWMZTcecXoET1dmZqd6Dt3WzOUi359A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAK044SjMmBnO8xdn2ogWMZTcecXoET1dmZqd6Dt3WzOUi359A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Yoshifumi Nishida <nsd.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 01:43:39 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAK044Rs3J-cweJz=fFyzPt5wAOrAnxmK_43Xa+F-iNxZgQmsA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "tcpm@ietf.org Extensions" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Cc: tcpm-chairs <tcpm-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000268dbe05ca3604db"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/AQOb1WBOB3xOEbz9kdPBzgxahhs>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Concluding WGLC for draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis-03
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 08:43:57 -0000

Hi authors,

I start preparing the write-up for 8312bis draft to submit it to IESG.
In order for this, could each of you provide the answer for the
following question?

7) Has each author confirmed that any and all appropriate IPR disclosures
required for full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79 have
already been filed.
    If not, explain why?

Thanks,
--
Yoshi

On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 1:32 AM Yoshifumi Nishida <nsd.ietf@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
> The chairs think 8312bis draft is in good shape and it's ready for
> submission.
> We know we had some discussions on how to handle ABC draft in the draft
> during the last WG meeting and there are on-going related discussions on
> the ML.
> However, we still think we can proceed with the draft as the
> relevance between the draft and the current discussions is not very high.
>
> If anyone has different thoughts on this, please let us know.
> Otherwise, we will prepare a writeup soon and submit it to IESG.
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Yoshi
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email