IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] another review of draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure[-10]

Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com> Mon, 29 September 2008 15:27 UTC

Return-Path: <tcpm-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tcpm-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-tcpm-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1605B3A6AFA; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 08:27:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F02D3A6AFA for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 08:27:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.471
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.471 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.128, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KZRBQFRrcAyl for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 08:27:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mgw-mx06.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [192.100.122.233]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC5083A6A8D for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 08:27:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vaebh105.NOE.Nokia.com (vaebh105.europe.nokia.com [10.160.244.31]) by mgw-mx06.nokia.com (Switch-3.2.6/Switch-3.2.6) with ESMTP id m8TFQg7f011843; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 18:26:42 +0300
Received: from esebh102.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.183]) by vaebh105.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 29 Sep 2008 18:26:24 +0300
Received: from net-202.nrpn.net ([10.241.184.208]) by esebh102.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 29 Sep 2008 18:26:23 +0300
Message-Id: <B35986E6-D8D7-4A9E-B8AB-3DB2E5C3FA29@nokia.com>
From: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
To: ext Anantha Ramaiah <ananth@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <0C53DCFB700D144284A584F54711EC5805DF435A@xmb-sjc-21c.amer.cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2)
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 18:26:18 +0300
References: <200808140650.IAA05627@TR-Sys.de> <0C53DCFB700D144284A584F54711EC5805DF435A@xmb-sjc-21c.amer.cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Sep 2008 15:26:23.0722 (UTC) FILETIME=[BB4DA4A0:01C92247]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
Cc: tcpm@ietf.org, Alfred HÎnes <ah@tr-sys.de>, "Mitesh Dalal (mdalal)" <mdalal@cisco.com>, rrs@cisco.com
Subject: Re: [tcpm] another review of draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure[-10]
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"; DelSp="yes"
Sender: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org

Hi,

(individual hat on)

On 2008-9-29, at 0:08, ext Anantha Ramaiah (ananth) wrote:
> In particular, regarding your observation of mentioning what the  
> document is doing, I agree that we should mention that it "updates  
> 793". I am hoping that nobody has any objection to this point.

since this document specifies an optional component to TCP, I'd argue  
that it should not update RFC793. If you look at the RFC Editor page,  
almost no other RFC updates RFC793, because even widely-deployed  
extensions (timestamps, SACK, etc.) are all optional. Even RFC2581  
doesn't update RFC793.

Lars
_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
tcpm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status