Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-ns-packet-08

Med, Hi!

>> The more I read draft-bestbar-teas-ns-packe, the more I’m convinced that
it should not be in Standards Track, but Informational.

We (authors) would be okay with whatever the WG consensus is on this.

Regards,
-Pavan

On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 7:32 AM <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
>
>
> Focusing on this important point which should BTW be linked to the IPR
> point raised in one of my reviews + Adrian’s review.
>
>
>
> Other approaches that do not require major changes were already called out
> in this thread. I hope a balanced approach will be adopted to
> discuss/document them.
>
>
>
> The more I read draft-bestbar-teas-ns-packe, the more I’m convinced that
> it should not be in Standards Track, but Informational.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Med
>
>
>
> *De :* Teas <teas-bounces@ietf.org> *De la part de* Adrian Farrel
> *Envoyé :* mercredi 2 mars 2022 12:23
> *À :* 'Tarek Saad' <tsaad.net@gmail.com>; 'Lou Berger' <lberger@labn.net>;
> 'TEAS WG' <teas@ietf.org>
> *Cc :* 'TEAS WG Chairs' <teas-chairs@ietf.org>;
> draft-bestbar-teas-ns-packet@ietf.org
> *Objet :* Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-ns-packet-08
>
>
>
>
>
> *[snip]*
>
>
>
> [AF] OK. Well, I think this document is showing that a lot of changes are
> needed in the network to support slicing in the form you envisage. I find
> that disappointing and think it would be nice to be able to support slicing
> on top of today’s packet networks with minimal changes. Did anyone think
> about how to do that?
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
>
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
>
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
> Thank you.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Teas mailing list
> Teas@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas
>