Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-ns-packet-08

Hi Bo, all,

I fully support your point (1). 

I think that approach is also the spirit of draft-barguil-teas-network-slices-instantation cited in a previous message in this thread. 

Cheers,
Med

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Teas <teas-bounces@ietf.org> De la part de Wubo (lana)
> Envoyé : mercredi 23 février 2022 13:40
> À : Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>; TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
> Cc : TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>; draft-bestbar-teas-ns-
> packet@ietf.org
> Objet : Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-ns-packet-08
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I have read the draft and have some questions with the text and terms.
> 
> 1. This document seems only define SFA (slice-flow aggregation) based
> mapping solution, that is, slice services mapping to SFAs, and SFAs to
> NRP(Network Resource Partition)s.
> If this draft is supposed to be a generic slicing realization document,
> I think, it should allow more options. For example, the slice services
> could be mapped to VPNs, and VPNs mapped to underlying resources with
> method described in draft-ietf-teas-te-service-mapping-yang.
> 
> 2. This draft refers to draft-bestbar-teas-yang-slice-policy, but the
> following definition are not consistent:
> 1) SFA is not defined in draft-bestbar-teas-yang-slice-policy, but is
> seems relevant from the definition. And I can't find NRP Policy
> selection Criteria in the model definition.
> Slice-Flow Aggregate: a collection of packets that match an NRP Policy
> selection criteria and are given the same forwarding treatment ;
> 
> 2) draft-bestbar-teas-yang-slice-policy defines Slice Selector, but
> apart from Slice Selector, this draft also defines FAS and FASL. It is
> recommended that the terms be consistent.
> FAS: Flow Aggregate Selector; FASL: Flow Aggregate Selector Label.
> 
> Thanks,
> Bo
> > -----邮件原件-----
> > 发件人: Teas [mailto:teas-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Lou Berger
> > 发送时间: 2022年2月18日 21:28
> > 收件人: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
> > 抄送: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>;
> > draft-bestbar-teas-ns-packet@ietf.org
> > 主题: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-ns-packet-08
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > This email begins a 2-week adoption poll for:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bestbar-teas-ns-packet/
> >
> > Please note that IPR has been disclosed on this document:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-bestbar
> > -teas-n
> > s-packet
> >
> > Please voice your support or objections to adoption on the list by the
> > end of the day (any time zone) March 4.
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Lou (as Co-chair)
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Teas mailing list
> > Teas@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas
> _______________________________________________
> Teas mailing list
> Teas@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.