Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-ns-packet-08

Hi WG,

I've reviewed the latest version of this document and support its adoption.

This document is aligned with the IETF network slice framework, and focuses on the scalability of NRP for network slice realization, which is helpful for the development and deployment of network slices.

Best

Xuesong

> -----Original Message-----

> From: Teas [mailto:teas-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lou Berger

> Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2022 8:11 PM

> To: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>; draft-bestbar-teas-ns-packet@ietf.org

> Cc: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>

> Subject: Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-ns-packet-08

>

> WG,

>

> It's been a couple of weeks since the last message related to the adoption poll.

> I think this means we have finally closed on the adoption discussion and it is

> time to move the document formally into the WG. Therefor:

>

> This document is now adopted.  Authors, please republish

> draft-bestbar-teas-ns-packet-10 as draft-bestbar-teas-ns-ip-mpls-00 with only

> the date and 'file-name' changed.

>

> Again, thanks to all who have contributed so far to this work and discussion -

> and look forward to the continued good discussion and contribution as the

> document progresses through the WG!

>

> Lou (as Co-chair)

>

> On 3/8/2022 10:10 AM, Lou Berger wrote:

> > WG,

> >

> > This adoption poll is now closed. Thank you all for the very good

> > responses and discussion!

> >

> > To me, I read the discussion as saying the document is very close to

> > being a good starting point as a WG document.  To get us there, I

> > think we need the following:

> >

> > 1) That the authors issue an update covering their planned/discussed

> > changes

> >

> > 2) Add a section that lists the open issues that should be addressed

> > prior to the WG Last Call and being submitted to the IESG for

> > publication

> >

> > 3) Change the document to Informational -- as there are currently no

> > interop or defined external behaviors required by the document

> >

> > Once this is done, I ask the WG to review this version and re-raise

> > any issue that they raised during the adoption call that is not

> > addressed or captured in the new Open Issues section.

> >

> > Once all adoption issues are addressed or documented, the document

> > will be republished as a -00 WG document.

> >

> > Thank you all for your contribution to the WG!

> >

> > Lou (as Co-chair)

> >

> > On 2/18/2022 8:28 AM, Lou Berger wrote:

> >> Hello,

> >>

> >> This email begins a 2-week adoption poll for:

> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bestbar-teas-ns-packet/

> >>

> >> Please note that IPR has been disclosed on this document:

> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-bestba

> >> r-teas-ns-packet

> >>

> >> Please voice your support or objections to adoption on the list by the end of

> the day (any time zone) March 4.

> >>

> >> Thank you,

> >> Lou (as Co-chair)

> >>

>

> _______________________________________________

> Teas mailing list

> Teas@ietf.org

> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas