IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements-01 a WG documents

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Thu, 17 September 2015 11:04 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53A181B2D0A for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 04:04:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OpQ-jVIvKOju for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 04:04:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gproxy7-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy7-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [70.40.196.235]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C6EDA1B2D06 for <teas@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 04:04:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 3505 invoked by uid 0); 17 Sep 2015 11:04:25 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cmgw4) (10.0.90.85) by gproxy7.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 17 Sep 2015 11:04:25 -0000
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmgw4 with id JB4N1r00R2SSUrH01B4RTo; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 05:04:25 -0600
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=QdD14Krv c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=wU2YTnxGAAAA:8 a=cNaOj0WVAAAA:8 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=-NfooI8aBGcA:10 a=uEJ9t1CZtbIA:10 a=ff-B7xzCdYMA:10 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=VGuUUK_AlRkb-kPiYNIA:9 a=bSO__TAbt-iceFlo:21 a=h-z6nS_SlRY-B0NU:21 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject; bh=d/AgzuQhLvalmUjnNfMwx4cfh29nLBRjLLdE0BhN6e4=; b=OIdfyN6goT2HaTMY5yb+m/aAauVAvktR2zncqdxJ78C6hicsjOL7MXkwwwZ4kcaIafVXv8d4duZLmTDKRTtcH6EPuvRpqqb6zNfd9iDZROLN5sbpaOmPYJfpJdNbItEY;
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:47940 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1ZcWzG-0006Cc-B0; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 05:04:22 -0600
To: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>, draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements@ietf.org
References: <55E75B39.1050101@labn.net>
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110
Message-ID: <55FA9E28.4060602@labn.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 07:04:08 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <55E75B39.1050101@labn.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net}
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/IdV0v100NIYXblq1lM5ZsOX_XMk>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements-01 a WG documents
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 11:04:29 -0000

All,
    The WG poll is closed.

Authors,
    Please republish draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements-01 as
draft-ietf-teas-vn-controller-requirements-00 with only the date and
file name changed.
Comments received (publicly and privately) should be discussed and
addresses in the -01 version.

Please note the file name change. Normally it's pretty formulaic.  But
this draft is a little different as it has evolved over time to its
current form and where we expect it to  go.  In particular, we see this
draft as a companion to the 'interconnected-te' work and covering the
various possible controller-based TE models  (where the previous work
was more focused on fully distributed control models).  So we think a
broader name warranted.

Again, no other changes to the draft should be made at this time.

Thank you,
Lou and Pavan

On 9/2/2015 4:25 PM, Lou Berger wrote:
> All,
>
> This is start of a two week poll on making
> draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements-01 a TEAS working group document.
> Please send email to the list indicating “yes/support” or “no/do not
> support”. If indicating no, please state your technical reservations
> with the document.  If yes, please also feel free to provide comments
> you'd like to see addressed once the document is a WG document.
>
> The poll ends September 16th
> Thanks,
> Lou and Pavan
>
> _______________________________________________
> Teas mailing list
> Teas@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email