Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements-01 a WG documents
"BELOTTI, SERGIO (SERGIO)" <sergio.belotti@alcatel-lucent.com> Sun, 20 September 2015 16:49 UTC
Return-Path: <sergio.belotti@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 630171AD0CD; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 09:49:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.61
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.61 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MANGLED_DOMAIN=2.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eX54HKrkmx4y; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 09:49:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpida-esg-02.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A7A11ACED8; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 09:49:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.239.2.42]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 937D74B57E86C; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 16:49:28 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.111]) by fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id t8KGnWXj020631 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sun, 20 Sep 2015 18:49:32 +0200
Received: from FR711WXCHMBA05.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.1.213]) by FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.111]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 18:49:32 +0200
From: "BELOTTI, SERGIO (SERGIO)" <sergio.belotti@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, "Varma, Eve L (Eve)" <eve.varma@alcatel-lucent.com>, Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>, Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements-01 a WG documents
Thread-Index: AQHQ8g7ZXpoch4vzOEW2FGClF4UyFp5CHU4AgAAhLACAA2KkoA==
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 16:49:31 +0000
Message-ID: <B9FEE68CE3A78C41A2B3C67549A96F48B760158F@FR711WXCHMBA05.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <55E75B39.1050101@labn.net> <55FA9E28.4060602@labn.net> <1A722C8D-3AC3-4CD4-BB0A-9E9C8155FD65@coriant.com> <55FB6000.4080904@labn.net> <4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE48129F0B44@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se> <CA+YzgTu38t9-aVnDn8u=BUz2rPqsrYg2dgVCc8Zc=KwGWmR+tg@mail.gmail.com> <4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE48129F0F0E@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se> <6D32668528F93D449A073F45707153D8BEBB01AB@US70UWXCHMBA03.zam.alcatel-lucent.com> <55FC25E2.2000004@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <55FC25E2.2000004@labn.net>
Accept-Language: it-IT, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.39]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/wgikeiWHPA4hcNgkyAyXkhWLjF4>
Cc: "Doolan, Paul (Coriant - US/Irving)" <paul.doolan@coriant.com>, "draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements@ietf.org" <draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements@ietf.org>, TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements-01 a WG documents
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 16:49:38 -0000
Please avoid to exploit the fact Eve was not present in Prague, to hold up something that never happen ! "The comments were made in Pargue (publicly and expanded upon privately), and I had a discussion with the Authors via e-mail during the adoption period" As reported by other WG participant there has not been any mention of clarifications or even changing name (!): none think that requirements document is complete , absolutely not, and now that WG support it as WG, this can exploit all the WG to enhance the content . Great for that. Moreover I'm one of the author and I never been asked privately to discuss nothing by the chair neither vocally nor via mail. Thanks Belotti Sergio - System Architect ALCATEL-LUCENT IP Routing&Transport via Trento 30 Vimercate (MB) - Italy phone +39 (039) 6863033 -----Original Message----- From: Lou Berger [mailto:lberger@labn.net] Sent: venerdì 18 settembre 2015 16:56 To: Varma, Eve L (Eve); Daniele Ceccarelli; Vishnu Pavan Beeram Cc: Doolan, Paul (Coriant - US/Irving); draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements@ietf.org; TEAS WG Subject: Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements-01 a WG documents On 09/18/2015 08:56 AM, Varma, Eve L (Eve) wrote: > Dear all, > > > > I must agree with Daniele’s points. In reviewing the inputs re > draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements becoming a WG document, which > resulted in its adoption as such, I don’t recall any inputs other than > “Support”; I didn’t see “Support, but clarify….” or “Support, but > change….” Given this, I am truly surprised at the discussion that has now arisen. Eve, See my last message. The comments were made in Pargue (publicly and expanded upon privately), and I had a discussion with the Authors via e-mail during the adoption period -- in this brief e-mail exchange I indicated that I decided to not impede adoption as I believe the current contents of the document is a great starting point for the WG. I specifically didn't want the discussion on what is basically how the "ACTN" *solution* fits in with the rest of IETF TE to impede the adoption of what is essentially a generic TE requirements document. > While I have no real issue in changing Transport to TE in the document > title to move this forward, though I don’t see the issue with using > the term Transport (which hasn’t been considered solely L0/L1 for a > long time), I hope that the authors would be able to move forward > quickly to publish as a WG draft with essentially the same title. Changing the title is not yet on the table and would not occur in the -00 rev of the document. Lou > > > > Bes regards, > > Eve > > > > *From:*Teas [mailto:teas-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Daniele > Ceccarelli > *Sent:* Friday, September 18, 2015 8:38 AM > *To:* Vishnu Pavan Beeram > *Cc:* Doolan, Paul (Coriant - US/Irving); Lou Berger; > draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements@ietf.org; TEAS WG > *Subject:* Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements-01 a WG > documents > > > > Pavan, > > > > Please see inline. > > > > BR > Daniele > > > > *From:*Vishnu Pavan Beeram [mailto:vishnupavan@gmail.com] > *Sent:* venerdì 18 settembre 2015 14:05 > *To:* Daniele Ceccarelli > *Cc:* Lou Berger; Doolan, Paul (Coriant - US/Irving); > draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements@ietf.org > <mailto:draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements@ietf.org>; TEAS WG > *Subject:* Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements-01 a WG > documents > > > > A few points to mull over and move the discussion along: > > - Fitting "ACTN" into the "TEAS" body of work: > Work focusing on "how TE networks can be abstracted and managed in a > controller(s) driven environment" is an obvious item of interest to > the WG. And this is primarily where we believe the "ACTN" work can > contribute; the requirements discussed in the document that just got > adopted by the WG aligns well with this. The intent behind the > name-change was to have something generic enough to capture what we > want this work to be about. Note that this is just a requirements > document and since this is the first document to be adopted in this > realm, it is important to get the "naming" right now rather than > later. "VN Controller" is perhaps not a great choice -- very much open > to other choices that would capture the essence of the first statement above. > > */[DanCe] The IETF is contribution driven. If the WG contributed a > draft related to a subset of what the chairs expect, it means that > there is interest just in that subset. If the chairs wanted something > generic enough they should have asked for a document generic enough > (before the wg adoption), not call for the adoption of a document and > then ask to change its scope. The authors are interested in writing > ACTN requirements, which not only is a subset of what the chairs ask > for but is also slightly different since we’re not speaking just about > nodes and links. /* > > > - Complementing existing TEAS work: > <draft-ietf-teas-interconnected-te-info-exchange> discusses the > architecture for the exchange of TE information between interconnected > TE networks in support of end-to-end TE path establishment. It > discusses in great detail the notion of "abstraction in TE networks". > Our sincere hope (belief rather) is that the <actn-requirements> > document (and other <actn> related documents that get adopted by the > WG) would be complementary to (/consistent with) the > <interconnected-te-info-exchange> draft. > > */[DanCe] What does complementary mean? Complementary in the sense > that interconnected TE is for multi-domain LSP establishment in > distributed control plane and ACTN does the same for centralized one? > ACTN has a broader scope. The multi domain and multi layer part can be > seen as complimentary, but again ACTN is not just nodes and links, it > includes services, VNF, network slices and so on./* > > > - Focus on the term "Controller": > One train of thought is to use this new work (conveniently facilitated > by the induction of ACTN into TEAS) to focus solely on the "controller" > aspects (given the belief that non-controller aspects are adequately > covered by existing solutions). Personally, I don't have a strong > preference on whether the "naming" should reflect this or not > (Danielle's latest suggestion - use "TE" in the ACTN acronym - is > pretty close to what I personally would like it to be), but it is > important to get some clarity on this "scoping" detail before zeroing in on any "name". > > */[DanCe] The scoping should have been made clear before the call for > adoption. The authors scoped the draft as X and asked for the adoption > of X and now they are requested to publish the draft as a starting > point for Y. In 2 years we have put together use cases, an > architecture and would have liked to start working on solutions for > that, we’d like not to start from the beginning again. Please note the > list of ACTN related drafts in TEAS (not to consider the expired ones > still submitted as > draft-xxxxx-actn…)/* > > */ /* > > http://tools.ietf.org/images/search-small.gif > <https://www.google.com/search?as_q=%22draft-klee-teas-actn-connectivi > ty-multi-domain-02%22&as_sitesearch=mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/t > eas/> > > > > draft-klee-teas-actn-connectivity-multi-domain > <http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-klee-teas-actn-connectivity-multi-doma > in-02.txt> > > > > -02 > <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-klee-teas-actn-connectivity-multi-do > main-02.txt> > > > > 2015-06-08 > > http://tools.ietf.org/images/search-small.gif > <https://www.google.com/search?as_q=%22draft-kumaki-teas-actn-multiten > ant-vno-00%22&as_sitesearch=mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/> > > > > draft-kumaki-teas-actn-multitenant-vno > <http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-kumaki-teas-actn-multitenant-vno-00.tx > t> > > > > -00 > <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kumaki-teas-actn-multitenant-vno-00. > txt> > > > > 2015-07-06 > > http://tools.ietf.org/images/search-small.gif > <https://www.google.com/search?as_q=%22draft-lam-teas-usage-info-model > -net-topology-01%22&as_sitesearch=mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tea > s/> > > > > draft-lam-teas-usage-info-model-net-topology > <http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-lam-teas-usage-info-model-net-topology > -01.txt> > > > > -01 > <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lam-teas-usage-info-model-net-topolo > gy-01.txt> > > > > 2015-07-03 > > http://tools.ietf.org/images/search-small.gif > <https://www.google.com/search?as_q=%22draft-lee-teas-actn-requirement > s-01%22&as_sitesearch=mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/> > > > > draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements > <http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements-01.txt> > > > > -01 > <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements-01.txt> > > > > 2015-07-27 > > http://tools.ietf.org/images/search-small.gif > <https://www.google.com/search?as_q=%22draft-leebelotti-teas-actn-info > -00%22&as_sitesearch=mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/> > > > > draft-leebelotti-teas-actn-info > <http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-leebelotti-teas-actn-info-00.txt> > > > > -00 > <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-leebelotti-teas-actn-info-00.txt> > > > > 2015-07-02 > > http://tools.ietf.org/images/search-small.gif > <https://www.google.com/search?as_q=%22draft-leeking-teas-actn-problem > -statement-00%22&as_sitesearch=mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/> > > > > draft-leeking-teas-actn-problem-statement > <http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-leeking-teas-actn-problem-statement-00 > .txt> > > > > -00 > <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-leeking-teas-actn-problem-statement- > 00.txt> > > > > 2015-06-09 > > http://tools.ietf.org/images/search-small.gif > <https://www.google.com/search?as_q=%22draft-suzuki-teas-actn-multidom > ain-opc-00%22&as_sitesearch=mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/> > > > > draft-suzuki-teas-actn-multidomain-opc > <http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-suzuki-teas-actn-multidomain-opc-00.tx > t> > > > > -00 > <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-suzuki-teas-actn-multidomain-opc-00. > txt> > > > > 2015-07-06 > > http://tools.ietf.org/images/search-small.gif > <https://www.google.com/search?as_q=%22draft-xu-teas-actn-abstract-ala > rm-report-00%22&as_sitesearch=mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/> > > > > draft-xu-teas-actn-abstract-alarm-report > <http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-xu-teas-actn-abstract-alarm-report-00. > txt> > > > > -00 > <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-xu-teas-actn-abstract-alarm-report-0 > 0.txt> > > > > 2015-07-06 > > http://tools.ietf.org/images/search-small.gif > <https://www.google.com/search?as_q=%22draft-ceccarelli-teas-actn-fram > ework-00%22&as_sitesearch=mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/> > > > > draft-ceccarelli-teas-actn-framework > <http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ceccarelli-teas-actn-framework-00.txt> > > > > -00 > <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ceccarelli-teas-actn-framework-00.tx > t> > > > > 2015-06-15 > > */ /* > > */ /* > > Regards, > > -Pavan > > > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 3:22 AM, Daniele Ceccarelli > <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com > <mailto:daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>> wrote: > > Lou, > > Is your concern mostly related to the "transport" word? In the last > years the concept of transport evolved pretty much, mostly with > transport SDN and it is no longer tied to the L0-L1 but it covers > whatever mean used to transport IP. Young already pointed out what the > draft aims to cover. > > If you're so strongly willing to change the name we could turn > "Transport" into TE so that it becomes Abstraction and Control of TE > networks. (this is my personal proposal, not shared by the other > ACTNers)...and ACTN remains, but with the "broader" scope and it is > "more" complementary to the interconnected TE. > The change of the file name is not just the change of a file name. > > Daniele > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Lou Berger [mailto:lberger@labn.net <mailto:lberger@labn.net>] >> Sent: venerdì 18 settembre 2015 02:51 >> To: Doolan, Paul (Coriant - US/Irving) >> Cc: TEAS WG; draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements@ietf.org > <mailto:draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements@ietf.org> >> Subject: Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements-01 a WG >> documents >> >> > >> Paul, >> >> On 9/17/2015 4:28 PM, Doolan, Paul (Coriant - US/Irving) wrote: >> > Hello Lou and Pavan, >> > >> > this instruction to change ACTN to VN-Controller seems a little >> > high >> handed. >> >> I/we hear you. But... >> >> > Young Lee, Danielle and their co-authors have spent a long time >> > working >> on this and creating mind share and name recognition for ACTN. I know >> what it stands for as do audiences around the world to whom the team >> have introduced the idea and from whom they have garnered support. >> >> That's fair, but from our perspective the IETF has been working TE a >> lot longer than the term ACTN has been around, and that is the >> context where this work fits. >> >> As I stated at the last meeting, it's my (not to speak for Pavan, but > think he >> agrees too) option that this work is complimentary to the > interconnected-te >> particularly as it is more focused on the >> controller/non-fully distributed control plane approaches. We think >> that covering such controller based TE models as very important and > fills an >> important gap in the TE architecture. >> >> Right now, we (the WG) are just at the requirements stage and those >> requirements apply quite broadly and that is what we (the chairs) >> want to make clear by the name change. >> >> > In contrast I have absolutely no idea what a vn-controller >> > requirements draft might be about and, >> >> > if you persist with this renaming, it clearly makes no sense to >> > make 'no >> other changes to the draft' since, at the very least, the (new) title > needs >> explanation. >> >> It's just a filename. That said, we (chairs) are trying to project > where the >> work will end up based on the WG consensus process. Chairs have >> changed names in the past and been right and sometimes wrong, but in >> the end we have an RFC published with the title that represents WG >> consensus and an RFC number. >> >> > I really think the draft should be adopted as (originally) named. >> > If > you want >> to change the name then coming back to the WG with a clearly >> articulated rationale and asking for its support would seem to me to >> be a more > inclusive >> way to do things. >> >> It's not unusual for chairs to change names of a draft at adoption. >> Normally it goes without comment. Perhaps if this wasn't the first 'actn' >> document it would have. >> >> Again, we're open to alternatives that capture the scope of the work. >> >> Lou >> >> > my 10cents, >> > pd >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Sep 17, 2015, at 7:04 AM, Lou Berger wrote: >> > >> >> All, >> >> The WG poll is closed. >> >> >> >> Authors, >> >> Please republish draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements-01 as >> >> draft-ietf-teas-vn-controller-requirements-00 with only the date >> >> and file name changed. >> >> Comments received (publicly and privately) should be discussed and >> >> addresses in the -01 version. >> >> >> >> Please note the file name change. Normally it's pretty formulaic. >> >> But this draft is a little different as it has evolved over time >> >> to its current form and where we expect it to go. In particular, >> >> we see this draft as a companion to the 'interconnected-te' work >> >> and covering the various possible controller-based TE models >> >> (where the previous work was more focused on fully distributed control models). >> >> So we think a broader name warranted. >> >> >> >> Again, no other changes to the draft should be made at this time. >> >> >> >> Thank you, >> >> Lou and Pavan >> >> >> >> On 9/2/2015 4:25 PM, Lou Berger wrote: >> >>> All, >> >>> >> >>> This is start of a two week poll on making >> >>> draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements-01 a TEAS working group document. >> >>> Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do >> >>> not support". If indicating no, please state your technical >> >>> reservations with the document. If yes, please also feel free to >> >>> provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the document is >> >>> a WG >> document. >> >>> >> >>> The poll ends September 16th >> >>> Thanks, >> >>> Lou and Pavan >> >>> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> Teas mailing list >> >>> Teas@ietf.org <mailto:Teas@ietf.org> >> >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas >> >>> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Teas mailing list >> >> Teas@ietf.org <mailto:Teas@ietf.org> >> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas >> > >> > > _______________________________________________ > Teas mailing list > Teas@ietf.org <mailto:Teas@ietf.org> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas > > >
- [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements-0… Lou Berger
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… BELOTTI, SERGIO (SERGIO)
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Dieter Beller
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Varma, Eve L (Eve)
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Yuji Tochio
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Quintin zhao
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Takuya Miyasaka
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Loa Andersson
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Xufeng Liu
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Leeyoung
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Zhangxian (Xian)
- [Teas] 答复: Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Zhenghaomian
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Fatai Zhang
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Huaimo Chen
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Kwangkoog Lee
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Mach Chen
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Aihua Guo
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… 鈴木敏明 / SUZUKI,TOSHIAKI
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Lou Berger
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… BELOTTI, SERGIO (SERGIO)
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Leeyoung
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Lou Berger
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Leeyoung
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Varma, Eve L (Eve)
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Lou Berger
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Doolan, Paul (Coriant - US/Irving)
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Lou Berger
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Lou Berger
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Zhangxian (Xian)
- [Teas] 答复: Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Zhenghaomian
- Re: [Teas] 答复: Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requir… Varma, Eve L (Eve)
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Vishnu Pavan Beeram
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Varma, Eve L (Eve)
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Igor Bryskin
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Lou Berger
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… BELOTTI, SERGIO (SERGIO)
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Lou Berger
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Lou Berger
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Doolan, Paul (Coriant - US/Irving)
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Leeyoung
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Leeyoung
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Lou Berger
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Leeyoung
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Lou Berger
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Leeyoung
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Igor Bryskin
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Lou Berger
- [Teas] 答复: Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Zhenghaomian
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Zhangxian (Xian)
- Re: [Teas] 答复: Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requir… Lou Berger
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Lou Berger
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… BELOTTI, SERGIO (SERGIO)
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… BELOTTI, SERGIO (SERGIO)
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Zhangxian (Xian)
- Re: [Teas] 答复: Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requir… Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [Teas] 答复: Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requir… Lou Berger
- Re: [Teas] 答复: Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requir… Varma, Eve L (Eve)
- Re: [Teas] 答复: Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requir… Lou Berger
- Re: [Teas] 答复: Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requir… Varma, Eve L (Eve)
- Re: [Teas] 答复: Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requir… Lou Berger
- Re: [Teas] 答复: Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requir… Leeyoung
- Re: [Teas] 答复: Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requir… Vishnu Pavan Beeram
- Re: [Teas] 答复: Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requir… Leeyoung
- Re: [Teas] 答复: Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requir… BELOTTI, SERGIO (SERGIO)
- Re: [Teas] 答复: Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requir… Vishnu Pavan Beeram
- Re: [Teas] 答复: Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requir… Leeyoung
- Re: [Teas] 答复: Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requir… BELOTTI, SERGIO (SERGIO)
- Re: [Teas] 答复: Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requir… Lou Berger
- Re: [Teas] 答复: Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requir… Leeyoung
- [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复: Pol… Lou Berger
- [Teas] WG adoption and draft naming process (Re: … Lou Berger
- Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复:… Igor Bryskin
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption and draft naming process (… Leeyoung
- Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复:… Leeyoung
- Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复:… Leeyoung
- Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复:… Igor Bryskin
- Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复:… Leeyoung
- Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复:… Lou Berger
- Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复:… Leeyoung
- Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复:… Vishnu Pavan Beeram
- Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复:… Zhangxian (Xian)
- Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复:… Giovanni Martinelli (giomarti)
- Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复:… Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复:… Igor Bryskin
- Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复:… Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复:… Leeyoung
- Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复:… Igor Bryskin
- Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复:… Leeyoung
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption and draft naming process (… Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复:… Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption and draft naming process (… Lou Berger
- Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复:… Igor Bryskin
- Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复:… Vishnu Pavan Beeram
- Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复:… Leeyoung
- Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复:… Vishnu Pavan Beeram
- Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复:… Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复:… Igor Bryskin
- Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复:… Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复:… Varma, Eve L (Eve)
- Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复:… Lou Berger
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption and draft naming process (… Lou Berger
- Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复:… Varma, Eve L (Eve)
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption and draft naming process (… Leeyoung
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption and draft naming process (… Lou Berger
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption and draft naming process (… Leeyoung