Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements-01 a WG documents

["Andrew G. Malis" <[e-mail]>]

Lou,

I'm very much in agreement with Paul.

Thanks,
Andy

On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 4:28 PM, Doolan, Paul (Coriant - US/Irving) <
[e-mail]> wrote:

> Hello Lou and Pavan,
>
> this instruction to change ACTN to VN-Controller seems a little high
> handed.
>
> Young Lee, Danielle and their co-authors have spent a long time working on
> this and creating mind share and name recognition for ACTN. I know what it
> stands for as do audiences around the world to whom the team have
> introduced the idea and from whom they have garnered support. In contrast I
> have absolutely no idea what a vn-controller requirements draft might be
> about and, if you persist with this renaming, it clearly makes no sense to
> make 'no other changes to the draft' since, at the very least, the (new)
> title needs explanation.
>
> I really think the draft should be adopted as (originally) named. If you
> want to change the name then coming back to the WG with a clearly
> articulated rationale and asking for its support would seem to me to be a
> more inclusive way to do things.
>
> my 10cents,
> pd
>
>
>
>
> On Sep 17, 2015, at 7:04 AM, Lou Berger wrote:
>
> >
> > All,
> >    The WG poll is closed.
> >
> > Authors,
> >    Please republish draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements-01 as
> > draft-ietf-teas-vn-controller-requirements-00 with only the date and
> > file name changed.
> > Comments received (publicly and privately) should be discussed and
> > addresses in the -01 version.
> >
> > Please note the file name change. Normally it's pretty formulaic.  But
> > this draft is a little different as it has evolved over time to its
> > current form and where we expect it to  go.  In particular, we see this
> > draft as a companion to the 'interconnected-te' work and covering the
> > various possible controller-based TE models  (where the previous work
> > was more focused on fully distributed control models).  So we think a
> > broader name warranted.
> >
> > Again, no other changes to the draft should be made at this time.
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Lou and Pavan
> >
> > On 9/2/2015 4:25 PM, Lou Berger wrote:
> >> All,
> >>
> >> This is start of a two week poll on making
> >> draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements-01 a TEAS working group document.
> >> Please send email to the list indicating “yes/support” or “no/do not
> >> support”. If indicating no, please state your technical reservations
> >> with the document.  If yes, please also feel free to provide comments
> >> you'd like to see addressed once the document is a WG document.
> >>
> >> The poll ends September 16th
> >> Thanks,
> >> Lou and Pavan
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Teas mailing list
> >> [e-mail]
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Teas mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas
>
> _______________________________________________
> Teas mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas
>