Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复: Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements-01 a WG documents)
"Varma, Eve L (Eve)" <eve.varma@alcatel-lucent.com> Thu, 01 October 2015 19:51 UTC
Return-Path: <eve.varma@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E888B1B2ED0; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 12:51:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.609
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.609 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, WEIRD_PORT=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8egM7bI2Hl5j; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 12:51:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpida-esg-01.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A43CB1B2EB6; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 12:51:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from us70tusmtp2.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.5.2.64]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 5CB87F6B7F079; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 19:51:01 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from US70TWXCHHUB03.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (us70twxchhub03.zam.alcatel-lucent.com [135.5.2.35]) by us70tusmtp2.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id t91Jp2SO013461 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 1 Oct 2015 19:51:02 GMT
Received: from US70UWXCHMBA03.zam.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.9.242]) by US70TWXCHHUB03.zam.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.5.2.35]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 15:51:01 -0400
From: "Varma, Eve L (Eve)" <eve.varma@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: "'lberger@labn.net'" <lberger@labn.net>, "'vishnupavan@gmail.com'" <vishnupavan@gmail.com>, "'leeyoung@huawei.com'" <leeyoung@huawei.com>
Thread-Topic: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复: Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements-01 a WG documents)
Thread-Index: AQHQ9vYPLPAP6QDMV0KadCdD8Cm1j55MRj8AgAAX3YCAAQ35gIAADliAgAAOb4CAACD8AIAAUYIAgAF9BYCAArDIAIAA4McAgADuUwCAAId8gIACYxDAgABdXYD//9bnYQ==
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 19:51:00 +0000
Message-ID: <6D32668528F93D449A073F45707153D8BEBBA0D7@US70UWXCHMBA03.zam.alcatel-lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <560D78DD.4080306@labn.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.5.27.17]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/ungRSbvlVJUr-3WDqG8Uij7Amaw>
Cc: "'IBryskin@advaoptical.com'" <IBryskin@advaoptical.com>, "'daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com'" <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>, "'teas@ietf.org'" <teas@ietf.org>, "'draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements@ietf.org'" <draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复: Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements-01 a WG documents)
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 19:51:12 -0000
Hi Lou, That's fine - more succint. Regards, Eve ----- Original Message ----- From: Lou Berger [mailto:lberger@labn.net] Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2015 02:18 PM To: Varma, Eve L (Eve); Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>; Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com> Cc: Igor Bryskin <IBryskin@advaoptical.com>; Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>; TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>; draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements@ietf.org <draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复: Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements-01 a WG documents) Even your proposed changes are in quotes: ACTN solutions will build on existing TE mechanisms "(i.e., TE constructs and TE protocol mechanisms)" wherever possible and appropriate; "however, this should not be construed as constraining protocol extension solutions if satisfying requirements necessitates this". how about *in place* of your changes NEW ACTN solutions will build on, and extend, existing TE constructs and mechanisms wherever possible and appropriate. Lou On 10/1/2015 12:55 PM, Varma, Eve L (Eve) wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Some additional clarifying text added on etherpad J > > > > Best regards, > > Eve > > > > *From:*Vishnu Pavan Beeram [mailto:vishnupavan@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, September 29, 2015 8:17 PM > *To:* Leeyoung > *Cc:* Igor Bryskin; Daniele Ceccarelli; Lou Berger; TEAS WG; Varma, > Eve L (Eve); draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements@ietf.org > *Subject:* Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复: Poll on > draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements-01 a WG documents) > > > > Young, Hi! > > The primary intent behind proposing the first statement ("build on > existing TE mechanisms") is to explicitly specify that the ACTN > solutions will build on existing TE constructs (TE-Tunnels/LSPs/Paths; > TE-Topological elements - TE-nodes/TE-links, etc) and TE protocol > mechanisms wherever possible and appropriate. > > The intent behind proposing the second statement ("controller based > approaches") is to explicitly indicate the inclusion of solutions > where the VN operations (as stated in the ACTN definition) are > orchestrated/controlled by one or more logically centralized entities > (controllers). > > Please feel free to edit the these two statements on etherpad (to > capture the above intent). > > Regards, > > -Pavan > > > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com > <mailto:leeyoung@huawei.com>> wrote: > > Hi Pavan, > > Can you elaborate what "existing TE mechanisms" is meant? Some > examples you have in mind for this term may help understand the text > better? > > In addition, what do you mean "controller-based" approaches? > > Thanks. > Young > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram [mailto:vishnupavan@gmail.com > <mailto:vishnupavan@gmail.com>] > Sent: Monday, September 28, 2015 8:59 PM > To: Igor Bryskin > Cc: Daniele Ceccarelli; Leeyoung; Lou Berger; TEAS WG; Varma, Eve L > (Eve); draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements@ietf.org > <mailto:draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements@ietf.org> > Subject: Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复: Poll on > draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements-01 a WG documents) > > We (Lou and I) would like to propose the following additional language > (see the text on etherpad towards the end of the ACTN definition - > http://etherpad.tools.ietf.org:9000/p/teas-actn-def): > > "ACTN solutions will build on existing TE mechanisms wherever possible > and appropriate. Support for controller-based approaches is > specifically included in the possible solution set." > > Thoughts? Please feel free to make edits on the etherpad. > > Regards, > -Pavan (and Lou) > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 8:34 AM, Igor Bryskin > <IBryskin@advaoptical.com <mailto:IBryskin@advaoptical.com>> > wrote: > > > Hi Daniele, > > > > > > > > Please, see in line. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Igor > > > > > > > > *From:* Daniele Ceccarelli [mailto:daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com > <mailto:daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>] > > *Sent:* Saturday, September 26, 2015 3:29 PM > > *To:* Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com <mailto:leeyoung@huawei.com>>; > Igor Bryskin < > > IBryskin@advaoptical.com <mailto:IBryskin@advaoptical.com>>; Vishnu > Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com <mailto:vishnupavan@gmail.com>> > > *Cc:* Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net <mailto:lberger@labn.net>>; TEAS > WG <teas@ietf.org <mailto:teas@ietf.org>>; Varma, > > Eve L (Eve) <eve.varma@alcatel-lucent.com > <mailto:eve.varma@alcatel-lucent.com>>; > > draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements@ietf.org > <mailto:draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements@ietf.org> > > *Subject:* RE: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复: Poll on > > > draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements-01 a WG documents) > > > > > > > > Igor, > > > > > > > > Young elaborated pretty well on my statements (thanks). > > > > > > > > I would say that a) and b) in your bullets perfectly define what I > > meant as infrastructure. > > > > > > > > c) is in my opinion a perfect example of connectivity service. You say > > that VPNs do not follow under the connectivity services category as > > they are not TE relate. Well a VPN does not provide TE, but connecting > > a VPN to a TE infrastructure in my opinion does. If a customer wants > > connectivity between 3 points with given TE constraints, why a VPN on > > top or a TE infrastructure shouldn’t meet that requirement? > > > > > > > > IB>> Current TEAS WG work – Abstract TE Topology model – does allow > > configuring customized TE topologies on per VPN basis. There is also a > > work being discussed to model topologies that combine routing and TE > > topologies as well as SPRING related information. Can you elaborate > > what exactly is missing from the ACTN point of view? > > > > > > > > On the virtual network function service, as Young mentioned, there are > > several use cases in ACTN and building the interaction between WAN SDN > > and Cloud SDN is a very common and requested use case. We could argue > > it’s not TEAS…well, if you correctly remember we tried to open a new > > working group because we thought that not 100% of the ACTN scope was > > covered by TEAS J > > > > > > > > IB>> This sounds like a good project for a company like ERICSSSON, > > however, what exactly are the problems you want to solve that have not > > been or are not being worked on in other WGs? > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > Daniele > > > > > > > > > > > > > *From:* Leeyoung [mailto:leeyoung@huawei.com > <mailto:leeyoung@huawei.com> <leeyoung@huawei.com > <mailto:leeyoung@huawei.com>>] > > *Sent:* venerdì 25 settembre 2015 22:45 > > *To:* Igor Bryskin; Daniele Ceccarelli; Vishnu Pavan Beeram; Leeyoung > > *Cc:* Lou Berger; TEAS WG; Varma, Eve L (Eve); > > draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements@ietf.org > <mailto:draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements@ietf.org> > > *Subject:* RE: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复: Poll on > > > draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements-01 a WG documents) > > > > > > > > Hi Igor, > > > > > > > > I agree with you from a pure TE connectivity perspective. > > > > > > > > What Daniele is talking about is case where a TE connectivity has some > > constraints related with “customer’s” VN service policy. One example, > > a DCI case where the decision in selecting a destination for VM > > migration through TE networks may have not only QoS requirement but > > also other factors beyond QoS. Among them can be DC location > > (end-point) profile, preference/policy and capability; VNF mapping to > > the DC location, etc. Of course, these factors are not a pure TE > > connectivity constraints, but these factors may impact how to choose > a destination of a TE connectivity from a source. > > > > > > > > So the argument is who are the customer of such services? A couple of > > use-cases for ACTN addressed this kind of issues and they all > > concerned about DCI issues. Some of them are application providers > > that need to move massively large amount of data sets across DCNs > and multiple WAN domains. > > > > > > > > Here’s the link for relevant use-cases: > > > > > > > > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-lopez-actn-vno-multidomains-01.t > > xt > > > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fang-actn-multidomain-dci-00 > > > > > > > > I see neither L2VPN or L3VPN alone can solve this type of issues. VPN > > operators can also be viewed as a customer to ACTN-enabled networks. > > In such case, there would be coordination across VPN providers and > > Transport providers to meet the end-customer’s need. > > > > > > > > We can clearly start with a pure TE connectivity model, but not > > limited to this pure model. What do you think? > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Young > > > > > > > > > *From:* Igor Bryskin [mailto:IBryskin@advaoptical.com > <mailto:IBryskin@advaoptical.com> > > <IBryskin@advaoptical.com <mailto:IBryskin@advaoptical.com>>] > > *Sent:* Friday, September 25, 2015 10:54 AM > > *To:* Daniele Ceccarelli; Vishnu Pavan Beeram; Leeyoung > > *Cc:* Lou Berger; TEAS WG; Varma, Eve L (Eve); > > draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements@ietf.org > <mailto:draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements@ietf.org> > > *Subject:* RE: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复: Poll on > > draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements-01 a WG documents) > > > > > > > > Hi Daniele, > > > > Please, see in line. > > > > > > > > Igor > > > > > > > > *From:* Daniele Ceccarelli [mailto:daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com > <mailto:daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com> > > <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com > <mailto:daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>>] > > *Sent:* Friday, September 25, 2015 9:56 AM > > *To:* Igor Bryskin <IBryskin@advaoptical.com > <mailto:IBryskin@advaoptical.com>>; Vishnu Pavan Beeram < > > vishnupavan@gmail.com <mailto:vishnupavan@gmail.com>>; Leeyoung > <leeyoung@huawei.com <mailto:leeyoung@huawei.com>> > > *Cc:* Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net <mailto:lberger@labn.net>>; TEAS > WG <teas@ietf.org <mailto:teas@ietf.org>>; Varma, > > Eve L (Eve) <eve.varma@alcatel-lucent.com > <mailto:eve.varma@alcatel-lucent.com>>; > > draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements@ietf.org > <mailto:draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements@ietf.org> > > *Subject:* RE: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复: Poll on > > draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements-01 a WG documents) > > > > > > > > I knew it was a topic worth being raised J > > > > > > > > Igor, I’ll use my personal definitions that didn’t end up in the final > > ACTN definition but it can be useful to understand each other. I see > > these > > 3 entities: > > > > > > > > 1. *Infrastructure*: nodes, links, but mostly LSP building the > > virtual networks between end points > > > > IB>> According to TE topology modeling we have: > > > > a) Provider native TE topology (provider network nodes and links), > > could be used as underlay supporting abstract TE topologies > > (overlays); > > > > b) Abstract TE topologies (customized per-client) (abstract nodes > > inter=connected by abstract links), overlays supported, for example, > > by provider native TE topology, could be configured by either > > provider, client or both > > > > c) Transport services provided to the client: traffic engineered > > connections connecting provider WRT a given service ingress/egress > > access links (i.e. links connecting client devices to the provider > > network). The service paths and parameters could be expressed by the > > client in terms of abstract topology elements, translated by the > > provider controller into terms of the provider native topology. > > > > > > > > 2. *Connectivity Services*: services built on top of the > > infrastructure to connect the clients, e.g. L2VPN, L3VPN. The > > customers asks for connectivity (with characteristics that will be > > mapped intor the > > infrastructure) identifying the end points. > > > > IB>> Why this is a part of ACTN? Don’t we have other WGs working on > this? > > > > Considering that this is TEAS WG work, what this has to do with TE? > > > > > > > > 3. *Virtual Network Function Services*: Services where the > customer > > needs a virtual function FOR one of its sites (e.g. VM instantiation). > > In most cases this is a request for connectivity towards A > > datacenter…which one is not of any importance for the customer. This > > is what is collected in Luyan’s use cases. > > > > IB>> The same questions > > > > > > > > I guess what you call “transport service” refers to the > > infrastructure? Or maybe both infrastructure and connectivity services? > > > > IB>> Please, see above > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > Daniele > > > > > > > > *From:* Igor Bryskin [mailto:IBryskin@advaoptical.com > <mailto:IBryskin@advaoptical.com> > > <IBryskin@advaoptical.com <mailto:IBryskin@advaoptical.com>>] > > *Sent:* venerdì 25 settembre 2015 15:04 > > *To:* Daniele Ceccarelli; Vishnu Pavan Beeram; Leeyoung > > *Cc:* Lou Berger; TEAS WG; Varma, Eve L (Eve); > > draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements@ietf.org > <mailto:draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements@ietf.org> > > *Subject:* RE: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复: Poll on > > draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements-01 a WG documents) > > > > > > > > Daniele, > > > > > > > > You are right. What you call “connectivity service” I call “transport > > service”, which is really “traffic engineered connectivity service”. > > You may think about “connectivity service” in a broader sense, e.g. IP > > or Ethernet non-TE (reachability based) connectivity, and it is a good > > question if such connectivity should be part of ACTN. I personally > > think not. > > > > > > > > One other type of service provided by network to client is Customized > > Abstract Topology itself, i.e. when the Customized Abstract Topology > > is (re-)configured by the client, as opposite to another use case when > > the Customized Abstract Topology is configured by the network operator > > and presented to the client in read-only mode. > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Igor > > > > > > > > > > > > *From:* Teas [mailto:teas-bounces@ietf.org > <mailto:teas-bounces@ietf.org>] *On Behalf Of *Daniele > > Ceccarelli > > *Sent:* Friday, September 25, 2015 8:13 AM > > *To:* Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com > <mailto:vishnupavan@gmail.com>>; Leeyoung < > > leeyoung@huawei.com <mailto:leeyoung@huawei.com>> > > *Cc:* Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net <mailto:lberger@labn.net>>; TEAS > WG <teas@ietf.org <mailto:teas@ietf.org>>; Varma, > > Eve L (Eve) <eve.varma@alcatel-lucent.com > <mailto:eve.varma@alcatel-lucent.com>>; > > draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements@ietf.org > <mailto:draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements@ietf.org> > > *Subject:* Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复: Poll on > > > draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements-01 a WG documents) > > > > > > > > Thanks Igor for the comment on the policies, when shrinking it into > > the text we did too much “zipping” and lost some bits of info > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Teas mailing list > Teas@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas
- [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements-0… Lou Berger
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… BELOTTI, SERGIO (SERGIO)
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Dieter Beller
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Varma, Eve L (Eve)
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Yuji Tochio
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Quintin zhao
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Takuya Miyasaka
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Loa Andersson
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Xufeng Liu
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Leeyoung
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Zhangxian (Xian)
- [Teas] 答复: Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Zhenghaomian
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Fatai Zhang
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Huaimo Chen
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Kwangkoog Lee
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Mach Chen
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Aihua Guo
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… 鈴木敏明 / SUZUKI,TOSHIAKI
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Lou Berger
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… BELOTTI, SERGIO (SERGIO)
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Leeyoung
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Lou Berger
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Leeyoung
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Varma, Eve L (Eve)
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Lou Berger
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Doolan, Paul (Coriant - US/Irving)
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Lou Berger
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Lou Berger
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Zhangxian (Xian)
- [Teas] 答复: Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Zhenghaomian
- Re: [Teas] 答复: Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requir… Varma, Eve L (Eve)
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Vishnu Pavan Beeram
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Varma, Eve L (Eve)
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Igor Bryskin
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Lou Berger
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… BELOTTI, SERGIO (SERGIO)
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Lou Berger
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Lou Berger
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Doolan, Paul (Coriant - US/Irving)
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Leeyoung
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Leeyoung
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Lou Berger
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Leeyoung
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Lou Berger
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Leeyoung
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Igor Bryskin
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Lou Berger
- [Teas] 答复: Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Zhenghaomian
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Zhangxian (Xian)
- Re: [Teas] 答复: Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requir… Lou Berger
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Lou Berger
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… BELOTTI, SERGIO (SERGIO)
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… BELOTTI, SERGIO (SERGIO)
- Re: [Teas] Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requiremen… Zhangxian (Xian)
- Re: [Teas] 答复: Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requir… Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [Teas] 答复: Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requir… Lou Berger
- Re: [Teas] 答复: Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requir… Varma, Eve L (Eve)
- Re: [Teas] 答复: Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requir… Lou Berger
- Re: [Teas] 答复: Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requir… Varma, Eve L (Eve)
- Re: [Teas] 答复: Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requir… Lou Berger
- Re: [Teas] 答复: Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requir… Leeyoung
- Re: [Teas] 答复: Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requir… Vishnu Pavan Beeram
- Re: [Teas] 答复: Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requir… Leeyoung
- Re: [Teas] 答复: Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requir… BELOTTI, SERGIO (SERGIO)
- Re: [Teas] 答复: Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requir… Vishnu Pavan Beeram
- Re: [Teas] 答复: Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requir… Leeyoung
- Re: [Teas] 答复: Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requir… BELOTTI, SERGIO (SERGIO)
- Re: [Teas] 答复: Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requir… Lou Berger
- Re: [Teas] 答复: Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requir… Leeyoung
- [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复: Pol… Lou Berger
- [Teas] WG adoption and draft naming process (Re: … Lou Berger
- Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复:… Igor Bryskin
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption and draft naming process (… Leeyoung
- Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复:… Leeyoung
- Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复:… Leeyoung
- Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复:… Igor Bryskin
- Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复:… Leeyoung
- Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复:… Lou Berger
- Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复:… Leeyoung
- Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复:… Vishnu Pavan Beeram
- Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复:… Zhangxian (Xian)
- Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复:… Giovanni Martinelli (giomarti)
- Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复:… Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复:… Igor Bryskin
- Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复:… Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复:… Leeyoung
- Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复:… Igor Bryskin
- Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复:… Leeyoung
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption and draft naming process (… Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复:… Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption and draft naming process (… Lou Berger
- Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复:… Igor Bryskin
- Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复:… Vishnu Pavan Beeram
- Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复:… Leeyoung
- Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复:… Vishnu Pavan Beeram
- Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复:… Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复:… Igor Bryskin
- Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复:… Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复:… Varma, Eve L (Eve)
- Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复:… Lou Berger
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption and draft naming process (… Lou Berger
- Re: [Teas] Proposed ACTN Definition Text (Re: 答复:… Varma, Eve L (Eve)
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption and draft naming process (… Leeyoung
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption and draft naming process (… Lou Berger
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption and draft naming process (… Leeyoung