Re: [Teas] 答复: Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements-01 a WG documents

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Tue, 22 September 2015 15:59 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 619201B2B0E for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 08:59:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.367
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.367 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GCzwCnSN6y8P for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 08:59:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gproxy8-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy8-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [67.222.33.93]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 23F3F1B2B0D for <teas@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 08:59:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 24748 invoked by uid 0); 22 Sep 2015 15:59:17 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO CMOut01) (10.0.90.82) by gproxy8.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 22 Sep 2015 15:59:17 -0000
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by CMOut01 with id LFz91r00e2SSUrH01FzCbT; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 09:59:17 -0600
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=EbVbHpWC c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=wU2YTnxGAAAA:8 a=cNaOj0WVAAAA:8 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=-NfooI8aBGcA:10 a=uEJ9t1CZtbIA:10 a=ff-B7xzCdYMA:10 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=_Cjn4snxKe7x0olPXtwA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:Cc:References:To:Subject; bh=zW2eVS93/2psERCUa6/GnzfNV1Uy7uk4b2Z6Nh9tVjM=; b=gA5aiFnq9C/KfwIXuibkXoLNIQrPjjgkcOApOj8acP+pO1f+ooTv8+iEpULecPNmnkUi78eTd5o8NZ0IE7cxI68CgXXBsWyNfDHiPnLKn/xVuA47Eerda4i12V+Hg6WD;
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:50662 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1ZePyI-0002Hh-HE; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 09:59:10 -0600
To: "Varma, Eve L (Eve)" <eve.varma@alcatel-lucent.com>, Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>, Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com>, "draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements@ietf.org" <draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements@ietf.org>
References: <55E75B39.1050101@labn.net> <55FA9E28.4060602@labn.net> <1A722C8D-3AC3-4CD4-BB0A-9E9C8155FD65@coriant.com> <55FB6000.4080904@labn.net> <4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE48129F0B44@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se> <CA+YzgTu38t9-aVnDn8u=BUz2rPqsrYg2dgVCc8Zc=KwGWmR+tg@mail.gmail.com> <4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE48129F0F0E@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se> <6D32668528F93D449A073F45707153D8BEBB01AB@US70UWXCHMBA03.zam.alcatel-lucent.com> <55FC25E2.2000004@labn.net> <E4AC9A6F-FA33-4707-9CDC-4920DC30BB72@coriant.com> <55FC3D86.6080102@labn.net> <7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E1729D1FCA7@dfweml706-chm> <55FC4D66.5070200@labn.net> <d2c37111aa12453c8a5143caa3709a71@ATL-SRV-MBX1.advaoptical.com> <55FC67E3.1030408@labn.net> <E0C26CAA2504C84093A49B2CAC3261A438CD7145@SZXEMA504-MBX.china.huawei.com> <55FEB30E.2060402@labn.net> <4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE4812A1CF18@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se> <5600BD48.9050408@labn.net> <6D32668528F93D449A073F45707153D8BEBB2938@US70UWXCHMBA03.zam.alcatel-lucent.com>
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110
Message-ID: <56017AC5.5080800@labn.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 11:59:01 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6D32668528F93D449A073F45707153D8BEBB2938@US70UWXCHMBA03.zam.alcatel-lucent.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net}
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/j3SZx41h8oytLu0k3otBilrzbQ4>
Cc: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>, TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Teas] 答复: Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements-01 a WG documents
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 15:59:24 -0000

Eve,
    Let's try to  focus on the getting the questions answered, with the
understanding that content changes go into -01. -00  will be the text
currently published.

As stated below:
> The basic question is how does ACTN fit into the TEAS WG. 

and more specifically, and for inclusion in -01:

> Could someone (individually or collectively) provide a definition of ACTN that would be suitable for inclusion in a -01 of the WG requirements document on the topic?

Any input on this would be much appreciated.

Thanks,
Lou

On 9/22/2015 11:39 AM, Varma, Eve L (Eve) wrote:
> Hi Lou,
>
> Adding a definition seems a reasonable thing to do, considering all the discussion that's taken place.  From a procedure perspective, I assume the authors should first publish draft-teas-actn-requirements-00 as a WG draft without any changes to the content, and thereafter proceed from there to change “Transport” to “TE” within the draft and add a definition?
>
> Best regards,
> Eve
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lou Berger [mailto:lberger@labn.net] 
> Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 10:31 PM
> To: Daniele Ceccarelli; Leeyoung; draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements@ietf.org
> Cc: Varma, Eve L (Eve); Vishnu Pavan Beeram; TEAS WG
> Subject: Re: [Teas] 答复: Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements-01 a WG documents
>
> Daniele, ACTN authors, All,
>
> On 9/21/2015 8:44 AM, Daniele Ceccarelli wrote:
>> ...
>> Looking forward to progress a fruitful thread and publishing the WG draft so work can progress.
>>
> Okay, let's take a step back here. 
>
> The basic question is how does ACTN fit into the TEAS WG. 
>
> Based on the discussions to date in the context of the WG, we thought we understood where we were going WRT ACTN, but perhaps not.  We also clearly expected to answer this in greater detail  as the WG  moved towards "ACTN" solutions. 
>
> As has been pointed out earlier in the thread, having the first document on a topic without any definition of the topic is a bit awkward.  So perhaps now would be a good time to provide a definition of ACTN that can be added to the requirements document. 
>
> Could someone (individually or collectively) provide a definition of ACTN that would be suitable for inclusion in a -01 of the WG requirements document on the topic?
>
> Also as mentioned before, it may be helpful to look at the MPLS-TP requirements document, RFC 5654, which provides an example of such a definition.
>
> Thank you,
> Lou
>
>
>