IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teas] 答复: Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements-01 a WG documents

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Tue, 22 September 2015 02:31 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF1E41A6FEF for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 19:31:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.367
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.367 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dZ4Wyo6ziFzk for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 19:30:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gproxy4-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy4-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.23.142]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9F5991A6FE1 for <teas@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 19:30:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 27356 invoked by uid 0); 22 Sep 2015 02:30:53 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cmgw4) (10.0.90.85) by gproxy4.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 22 Sep 2015 02:30:53 -0000
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmgw4 with id L2Wq1r00X2SSUrH012Wtg9; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 20:30:53 -0600
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=QdD14Krv c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=wU2YTnxGAAAA:8 a=cNaOj0WVAAAA:8 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=-NfooI8aBGcA:10 a=uEJ9t1CZtbIA:10 a=ff-B7xzCdYMA:10 a=HBdFVScMCZ8buFdDc8oA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:Cc:References:To:Subject; bh=UDLeRLTciY5tonC9Lw/uS1C0iBGumK8GrihBRv/9nng=; b=J+X/xbqLzcBU2EktDW0xczKYovI7HhqZnhLZwkvRsTsfyERE2SnUNslFWzr1JBAZXmPFpF7wh+fTLLV7hgvt8u7Elbtoe3ttPWph1KGY2jyGW9Of3n+qYOniOAd9tIFO;
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:41289 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1ZeDM2-0003Xk-CQ; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 20:30:50 -0600
To: Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>, Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com>, "draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements@ietf.org" <draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements@ietf.org>
References: <55E75B39.1050101@labn.net> <55FA9E28.4060602@labn.net> <1A722C8D-3AC3-4CD4-BB0A-9E9C8155FD65@coriant.com> <55FB6000.4080904@labn.net> <4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE48129F0B44@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se> <CA+YzgTu38t9-aVnDn8u=BUz2rPqsrYg2dgVCc8Zc=KwGWmR+tg@mail.gmail.com> <4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE48129F0F0E@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se> <6D32668528F93D449A073F45707153D8BEBB01AB@US70UWXCHMBA03.zam.alcatel-lucent.com> <55FC25E2.2000004@labn.net> <E4AC9A6F-FA33-4707-9CDC-4920DC30BB72@coriant.com> <55FC3D86.6080102@labn.net> <7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E1729D1FCA7@dfweml706-chm> <55FC4D66.5070200@labn.net> <d2c37111aa12453c8a5143caa3709a71@ATL-SRV-MBX1.advaoptical.com> <55FC67E3.1030408@labn.net> <E0C26CAA2504C84093A49B2CAC3261A438CD7145@SZXEMA504-MBX.china.huawei.com> <55FEB30E.2060402@labn.net> <4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE4812A1CF18@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se>
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110
Message-ID: <5600BD48.9050408@labn.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 22:30:32 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE4812A1CF18@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net}
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/NjXhf38s7kteNyMha-xZLQTOazQ>
Cc: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>, Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>, "Varma, Eve L (Eve)" <eve.varma@alcatel-lucent.com>
Subject: Re: [Teas] 答复: Poll on draft-lee-teas-actn-requirements-01 a WG documents
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 02:31:00 -0000

Daniele, ACTN authors, All,

On 9/21/2015 8:44 AM, Daniele Ceccarelli wrote:
> ...
> Looking forward to progress a fruitful thread and publishing the WG draft so work can progress.
>

Okay, let's take a step back here. 

The basic question is how does ACTN fit into the TEAS WG. 

Based on the discussions to date in the context of the WG, we thought we
understood where we were going WRT ACTN, but perhaps not.  We also
clearly expected to answer this in greater detail  as the WG  moved
towards "ACTN" solutions. 

As has been pointed out earlier in the thread, having the first document
on a topic without any definition of the topic is a bit awkward.  So
perhaps now would be a good time to provide a definition of ACTN that
can be added to the requirements document. 

Could someone (individually or collectively) provide a definition of
ACTN that would be suitable for inclusion in a -01 of the WG
requirements document on the topic?

Also as mentioned before, it may be helpful to look at the MPLS-TP
requirements document, RFC 5654, which provides an example of such a
definition.

Thank you,
Lou

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email