IETF Logo Mail Archive

[therightkey] Forest Model -> was RE: First public DNSChain server went online yesterday!

Paul Lambert <paul@marvell.com> Tue, 11 February 2014 01:47 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@marvell.com>
X-Original-To: therightkey@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: therightkey@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78A0D1A0649 for <therightkey@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 17:47:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.566
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.566 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sJKB9S9eC-Pu for <therightkey@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 17:47:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0b-0016f401.pphosted.com (mx0b-0016f401.pphosted.com [67.231.156.173]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FFB41A0635 for <therightkey@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 17:47:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0045851.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-0016f401.pphosted.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id s1B1lbJS010270; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 17:47:37 -0800
Received: from sc-owa03.marvell.com ([199.233.58.149]) by mx0b-0016f401.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 1hxacbx1un-21 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 10 Feb 2014 17:47:37 -0800
Received: from SC-vEXCH2.marvell.com ([10.93.76.134]) by SC-OWA03.marvell.com ([fe80::4561:8e1c:d59b:f770%17]) with mapi; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 17:47:34 -0800
From: Paul Lambert <paul@marvell.com>
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 17:47:33 -0800
Thread-Topic: Forest Model -> was RE: [therightkey] First public DNSChain server went online yesterday!
Thread-Index: Ac8lPFqpZ1yIjPI/Qo+ElAVW/EjhlgBjUX5w
Message-ID: <7BAC95F5A7E67643AAFB2C31BEE662D018B81B8A99@SC-VEXCH2.marvell.com>
References: <CAMm+Lwj1MS1yK4Luh5VvgSa9z24UwQ6iJUsS79nkkwgQ3-7gbA@mail.gmail.com> <06140551-4076-4402-ABA6-3EB78CFB9F0B@taoeffect.com> <F7057F5F-8291-4CE2-A8A4-B81ED3E011A1@taoeffect.com> <20140207193212.GQ22727@crankycanuck.ca> <32201143-1945-4705-A240-522F41535545@taoeffect.com> <alpine.LFD.2.10.1402072050380.28278@bofh.nohats.ca> <B76BA5D8-87B4-4730-A960-776CF3434A4C@taoeffect.com> <23D8B61D-A198-40FB-9672-83AF23018AE9@vpnc.org> <CAMm+Lwi8gA_k=3Rf=9JVyKxUP42aASE7r2KzvSh5GDV77jKfYQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+Lwi8gA_k=3Rf=9JVyKxUP42aASE7r2KzvSh5GDV77jKfYQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7BAC95F5A7E67643AAFB2C31BEE662D018B81B8A99SCVEXCH2marve_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.11.87, 1.0.14, 0.0.0000 definitions=2014-02-10_04:2014-02-10, 2014-02-10, 1970-01-01 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1305240000 definitions=main-1402100180
Cc: "therightkey@ietf.org" <therightkey@ietf.org>, Tao Effect <contact@taoeffect.com>
Subject: [therightkey] Forest Model -> was RE: First public DNSChain server went online yesterday!
X-BeenThere: therightkey@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <therightkey.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/therightkey>, <mailto:therightkey-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/therightkey/>
List-Post: <mailto:therightkey@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:therightkey-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/therightkey>, <mailto:therightkey-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 01:47:41 -0000

>Why would anyone need a certificate in this system? The binding to a public key is intrinsic to the whole naming architecture.
Yes!

>Come to that, why would anyone need .dns??? If namecoin is going to replace the DNS,
>why make the mistake of upper level hierarchy? Surely the new system should be the apex
>of the hierarchy and the legacy DNS subordinated under .icann.
>
>I do have a solution though. There are some TLDs that are not expletives that are almost
>certain to be permanently withheld from issue. I suggest they consider using .pot or .weed.

I prefer the forest model ... every key can define a namespace:

paulehoffman.com.73940a8b75ac184ddbe3ca3c2c809c67


Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email