Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA registry rules for cipher suites

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Wed, 30 March 2016 16:08 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA42D12D161 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 09:08:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.731
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.731 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Dj0_dVimD0XF for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 09:08:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com (prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com [23.79.238.175]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B13B12D52E for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 09:08:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss70 (Postfix) with ESMTP id A67FA43346E; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 16:08:32 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from prod-mail-relay10.akamai.com (prod-mail-relay10.akamai.com [172.27.118.251]) by prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E67743346B; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 16:08:32 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; s=a1; t=1459354112; bh=iJON0Z4Htrpu7m84gFUFDon/3cjP0G/z4GE2AwyINeY=; l=249; h=From:To:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=HVgf0GfXGsh9k54FH9dtlhyDLlfEgJZV9rUhB0A7/62/iLf6NLMjZ+nQiWjsXKlK+ AJJqJFNlxZemRjqv/kgqIbwm94kuuQfCgVRStcNoMF5ZbpWZRY9lEobHNRHEMrHcf/ HZ5jucDBEHRNlVNPYUMLuQrPHplnR/Rk6Ns1JKwY=
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com (usma1ex-cas2.msg.corp.akamai.com [172.27.123.31]) by prod-mail-relay10.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 876831FC86; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 16:08:32 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1130.7; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 12:08:32 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1130.005; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 12:08:32 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>, "Kaduk, Ben" <bkaduk@akamai.com>, Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>, "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA registry rules for cipher suites
Thread-Index: AQHRipmQi4OpUGce3UupQ9LKK53UB59yacwA//+9f3A=
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 16:08:31 +0000
Message-ID: <dd716252dfd745f8bb18d5e4dd3cdb5c@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <20DDE657-E1A9-4705-936D-40673294C4EB@sn3rd.com> <56FBF1B5.8030906@akamai.com> <8737r8ymrd.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net>
In-Reply-To: <8737r8ymrd.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.119.59]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/91_GQHS0BLe8tFpWxamDdKfKldY>
Subject: Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA registry rules for cipher suites
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 16:08:35 -0000

> I think i'd rather see it stay at "approved/not-approved"

There is also the concern that various parties (e.g., national crypto) can get upset by this kind of thing.  Which is why I prefer "approved/no-comment" as the dividing line.