IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA registry rules for cipher suites

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Thu, 31 March 2016 01:22 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65C0D12D0CF for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 18:22:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZnSxEh9Sgn6I for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 18:22:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-x22e.google.com (mail-ig0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B254F12D0CC for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 18:22:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ig0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id cl4so115934972igb.0 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 18:22:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=u7miffiH5meNlH4N0HTrUhNO1IDWXki2crbXig1QlII=; b=AQ4c2UaQDj9YEmxdCxnvbsW3iBf4EnGoXysH8MkBBudUsYDXBuOskIabHnfnOxEyNr HqG61ac8PNTqy++9ahM1hQOXPK120E/kgqTrAdurv+U459KZfFTAcwVYUM+K7a7HAdsZ XZi9hmzbWi+QjEcqTBjYI2g9cZ4QvM6ZWVuk6CZAZtenrX8zoKjMEE9yP2ORi79xBcT4 4/fOwNJL9AYEDrpJl1aOfK0gSdJfH5WHluy2BB6gO2K3mkLNfwnhM+178amW1R32exZR z2nU4dijZhUauwlT+bHQ9RkzoJzWoijsSKcqLZfhT+liarfQtUdBoDh7q//oKZupuJ2f 4LQQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=u7miffiH5meNlH4N0HTrUhNO1IDWXki2crbXig1QlII=; b=N3xOiEj2FTAYs+fZq5nr7QB+mXPjkOs7YjZBoazuz60jaOCEtp0syrWcxucGl5iIHD DWhjaVs7tkhoJwiTNWjSXe8O5uKUZTu/zfWNtY2IE+t8FVNpuiyjLZyXfYN4Dz4hZuAY lt1A1ByG5CgpUPs0f0xdBzwUw2Py9SnxTFwPZFdIMVSuUNYDPwcvDCHTOiNZF3wQCK/W ngjFa27VeK6N6OKhmzwDh8IWiQIe88B7U9Ee5+d/k3sPHiDMJiR0TIRX0QI6H1SrFWCg XA+1CBC23953r52CXoAV3Pa1I4PFJaJ3fX7aasiRSljzDpArW4NhM0HLObBb4U7FAy5y B7Yw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJKaOPXK9bshU9lH+GeLjvtGMzoVKGqcl2JF8QEx/xf+udHJyoQbZWBbATlkPbPwijdMW/FtterPL8M6UQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.43.226 with SMTP id z2mr1662166igl.94.1459387342118; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 18:22:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.36.43.142 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 18:22:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20DDE657-E1A9-4705-936D-40673294C4EB@sn3rd.com>
References: <20DDE657-E1A9-4705-936D-40673294C4EB@sn3rd.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 12:22:21 +1100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnUEsRDVTDUWuck=rnAnq3Qi9NAqSGW+JyYv4V7tZJYKWg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/LkmLkasSkajtRaCpSWuevWL-x9Y>
Cc: "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA registry rules for cipher suites
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 01:22:24 -0000

On 30 March 2016 at 12:53, Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> wrote:
> Cipher suites marked with a “Y” the IETF has consensus on


As long as that consensus is for the "Y", then this is a great plan.

I think that there's consensus on a lot of "N" entries too.  However,
if there is any dispute or doubt, it's still "N".

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email