IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA registry rules for cipher suites

Henrick Hellström <henrick@streamsec.se> Wed, 30 March 2016 11:40 UTC

Return-Path: <henrick@streamsec.se>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 969FD12D661 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 04:40:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A6UMg0wYaxla for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 04:40:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vsp5.ballou.se (vsp5.ballou.se [91.189.40.84]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id EDFD312D652 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 04:40:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Halon-Scanned: 7f4a955dd6f4c149d51110a345668da22aa82d04
Received: from nmail1.ballou.se (unknown [10.0.0.116]) by vsp5.ballou.se (Halon Mail Gateway) with ESMTP for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:40:39 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.0.190] (c-76cbe555.06-134-73746f39.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se [85.229.203.118]) (Authenticated sender: henrick@streamsec.se) by nmail1.ballou.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9A93BC93DE for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:40:39 +0200 (CEST)
References: <20DDE657-E1A9-4705-936D-40673294C4EB@sn3rd.com> <CADqLbzJD5V_cvNEb3qHQDJOs_wx2LKC6qjACO+EbeMqkKAwpCA@mail.gmail.com>
To: tls@ietf.org
From: Henrick Hellström <henrick@streamsec.se>
Message-ID: <56FBBB28.4010902@streamsec.se>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:40:24 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CADqLbzJD5V_cvNEb3qHQDJOs_wx2LKC6qjACO+EbeMqkKAwpCA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/nJlzADr0cCKRuwCgkQPBhocByaE>
Subject: Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA registry rules for cipher suites
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: henrick@streamsec.se
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 11:40:46 -0000

On 2016-03-30 13:27, Dmitry Belyavsky wrote:
> Dear Sean,
>
> I support the plan in general, but I think that we need to separately
> indicate
> that a particular algorithm/ciphersuite is not just "Not recommended"
> but found insecure.

This does indeed sound reasonable.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email