IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] About encrypting SNI

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Tue, 15 April 2014 16:37 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9291F1A0499 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Apr 2014 09:37:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.471
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.471 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.272] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8dD9UsY-BmpT for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Apr 2014 09:37:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay02.akamai.com (prod-mail-xrelay02.akamai.com [72.246.2.14]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D874F1A01BE for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Apr 2014 09:37:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay02.akamai.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss70 (Postfix) with ESMTP id D103C28642; Tue, 15 Apr 2014 16:36:58 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from prod-mail-relay06.akamai.com (prod-mail-relay06.akamai.com [172.17.120.126]) by prod-mail-xrelay02.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC9BB28641; Tue, 15 Apr 2014 16:36:58 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from usma1ex-cashub.kendall.corp.akamai.com (usma1ex-cashub5.kendall.corp.akamai.com [172.27.105.21]) by prod-mail-relay06.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8A4A2035; Tue, 15 Apr 2014 16:36:58 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.107.26]) by USMA1EX-CASHUB5.kendall.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.105.21]) with mapi; Tue, 15 Apr 2014 12:36:58 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 12:36:57 -0400
Thread-Topic: [TLS] About encrypting SNI
Thread-Index: Ac9YxMGttJKH1S5mQ3auG/awb964lwAAsldg
Message-ID: <2A0EFB9C05D0164E98F19BB0AF3708C7120B4903F3@USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <2A0EFB9C05D0164E98F19BB0AF3708C7120A04ED40@USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com> <534C3D5A.3020406@fifthhorseman.net> <474FAE5F-DE7D-4140-931E-409325168487@akamai.com> <D2CB0B72-A548-414C-A926-A9AA45B962DA@gmail.com> <2A0EFB9C05D0164E98F19BB0AF3708C7120B490162@USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com> <CACsn0cmusUc3Rsb2Wof+dn0PEg3P0bPC3ZdJ75b9kkZ5LDGu_A@mail.gmail.com> <2A0EFB9C05D0164E98F19BB0AF3708C7120B490291@USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com> <A4745833-76B0-45C3-B926-B240602F2289@gmail.com> <2A0EFB9C05D0164E98F19BB0AF3708C7120B4902B5@USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com> <CABcZeBOL62uRa+OM0Q2gf=PpJKjBJNHCSm-Gui24H3Ldy_J+1w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBOL62uRa+OM0Q2gf=PpJKjBJNHCSm-Gui24H3Ldy_J+1w@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_2A0EFB9C05D0164E98F19BB0AF3708C7120B4903F3USMBX1msgcorp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/QpRz-Ym2NaL1DE2veTYIonNrTtU
Cc: "TLS@ietf.org (tls@ietf.org)" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] About encrypting SNI
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 16:37:03 -0000

Yes, you have it right.  Alyssa's concerns about DNS are valid, but I do wonder if the CNAME security requirements are any different than the A/AAAA security requirements; I need to think about it.

                /r$

--
Principal Security Engineer
Akamai Technology
Cambridge, MA

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email